Sunday, April 10, 2011

Trending: Conservative group puts out anti-Obama TV ad

Trending: Conservative group puts out anti-Obama TV ad

CNN ^ | 4/10/11 | Paul Steinhauser

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 7:59:06 PM by Nachum

Washington - Call it an appetizer, with the main course still to come. An independent conservative group says it's going up in some battleground states with a television commercial that's critical of President Barack Obama, one of the first of what could be many ads by similar groups on the right.

Joe Wierzbecki, the executive director of the organization, tells CNN that the ad began running this weekend on television stations in Nevada, with ad time being purchased in Michigan and Wisconsin. Wierzbecki says his plan is to eventually also run the commercial in Colorado, Missouri and Ohio.The spot, titled

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Trump is Final Proof that the Political Class Has Failed

Trump is Final Proof that the Political Class Has Failed ^ | 4/10/2011 | James Poulos

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 8:29:08 PM by BfloGuy

There are two main theories cooperating to explain the Trump phenomenon:

1.Donald Trump is today's best self-promoter and professional opportunist.
2.The Republican field of presumptive candidates for president is lame.

But neither of these, nor even both together, can adequately explain what's going on. We can't even turn for supplemental help to subtheories that emphasize the rise of celebreality culture, the fall of Sarah Palin, or The Continuing Story of Bungling Barry. These variables all appear somewhere in the equation that has produced the Trump phenomenon.

But none of them explain it.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Simon & Schuster's Revenge

Simon & Schuster's Revenge

American Thinker ^ | 04/02/20011 | Douglas Hackleman

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 9:03:31 PM by ebysan

Simon & Schuster's Revenge

By Douglas Hackleman

In 1993, thirty-three-year-old Barack Obama stiffed Poseidon Press, then an imprint of Simon & Schuster -- producing absolutely nothing for the publisher that in November 1990 had given the new graduate of Harvard Law School a $125,000 advance to write a book about race relations in America .

Eighteen years later, Simon & Schuster has achieved a modicum of revenge (intended or not) by contracting with literary and intellectual sleuth Jack Cashill to impose on Obama a little of the transparency he so disingenuously promised during the campaign of 2008. Given Obama's approach to truth, the title of Cashill's sometimes impertinent sounding imposition --Deconstructing Obama: The Life, Loves, and Letters of America 's First Postmodern President -- suggests an appropriate methodology.
In this ever so readable and informative book, Cashill has taken great pains to corral probative evidence for two interesting matters: (1) the truth about who finally wrote Dreams From My Father, the essay-cum-memoir that Random House -- providing its own advance of $40,000 -- eventually published; and (2) very reasonable questions about the paternity of the current president of the United States.

It had not occurred to Cashill in the autumn of 2008 to wonder who wrote Dreams, until a friend's query about the political significance of some passages from the book led him to purchase a copy. As one who writes for a living, who teaches writing, who has been the book doctor to the publications of others and who is the author of a recent book, Hoodwinked, about literary and intellectual fraud, Cashill has antennae finely tuned to assess the writing quality of any text he reads. Of the thousand-plus portfolios of professional writers Cashill had read " . at April 02, 2011 - 03:23:41 PM CDT
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Trump is Right and is Now Turning to the Real Issue – What is a ‘Natural Born Citizen?’

Trump is Right and is Now Turning to the Real Issue – What is a ‘Natural Born Citizen?’

The International News Magazine ^ | April 11, 2011 | Zach Jones

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 7:52:10 PM by 2ndDivisionVet

Trump has been right in bringing up Obama’s eligibility/natural born citizen issue, the ‘birther’ issue. No one else (at this point in time) has the clout or the guts to tackle it. No other politician or ethical reporter will cover this issue in any depth because the Political Correctness (PC) police have been out in full force intimidating all who might dare to raise any questions. They’ve been very successful too. That’s why ‘birther’ is the name everyone associates with it; and why most associate the meaning the name implies – not born in Hawaii. No independent thought necessary! However, it is an issue that needs to be addressed, if for no other reason that we have military men and women fighting around the world at Obama’s beck and call.

And the high stakes game, it appears will have a few more hands to play.
The issue with Obama’s eligibility (regardless of what the media is trying to lead you to believe) not only involves the place of his birth but also his conflicted allegiances vis-à-vis the citizenship of his father.
Unfortunately, there is no Supreme Court decision that I know of where the Court addresses the specific question (in a case where it is factually necessary to the facts and issue presented) of who can and can’t be a Natural Born Citizen, other than in the penumbra of discussions/historical presentations in cases involving ordinary and/or naturalized citizenship.

However, the relevant writings/common understandings that were available to the Founders and the ones that have been suggested that the Founders relied, suggest (see article by Prof. Solum in ‘Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause’) that to be a natural born citizen requires being born in country to parents (2) who were citizens at the time of the person’s birth.
Further, the significance of the Constitutional provision containing both the terms ‘Citizen’ and ‘Natural Born Citizen’ clearly indicate there is a difference in meaning in the two. This has been recognized in several cases and writings. The reasons for inclusion of the Presidential eligibility restrictions are also recognized as being the need for and/or fear of a person becoming President who did not have complete/sole allegiance to the new nation. In your heart of hearts, do your perceptions of Obama’s actions and ideology validate the Founders' concerns? For me, the answer seems obvious.

Did you see that Trump had a meeting with a group that included a Rep. from Arizona and gave out some homework? In that meeting, Mr. Trump asked for information regarding the term "natural born citizen". Only the Donald can assign research as homework and not have to pay for it. Once Donald Trump receives the information asked for, he will then be in a position to force the main street media's hand; and call them on their decision to cut the public out of considering the Obama eligibility issue in any meaningful, thoughtful way.
Simply labeling everyone asking questions ‘birthers’ is neither meaningful nor thoughtful.
Keep in mind that, Trump also has his mother's naturalized citizenship status as a possible springboard should he decide to file a suit for a Declaratory Judgment indicating he (Trump) is eligible.

That’s an ace in the hole that only Trump has!
Get your Popcorn ready! Trump has sent investigators to Hawaii and is collecting his assigned homework. There are more hands to play!

EXCLUSIVE: The Truth Behind Beck Shutting Down Daily Fox Show

EXCLUSIVE: The Truth Behind Beck Shutting Down Daily Fox Show

Jeff Dunetz ^ | 4/10/11 | Big Journalism

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 7:53:55 PM by Nachum

Yesterday I was all confused, when I originally heard the news that Glenn Beck was leaving his daily Fox TV show, I wasn’t surprised. Beck had been dropping hints about it since the end of 2010. He was saying things like, “You must prepare yourselves to carry on without me,” which was a signal that he was either looking for other opportunities, God-forbid had a fatal illness, or that girl he dated finally admitted to the police that he was fully aware of the fact that she was only nine.

On the other hand, the folks at Media Matters claimed victory, they said their efforts to slander Beck had finally worked and Fox was getting rid of him. According to the Soros funded group, Beck’s audience was way down (even though he still beats most prime time cable audiences) and thanks to their efforts, every TV advertiser in the universe refused to advertise on his program (even those in the Gamma Quadrant).

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

President Obama Blames YOU for High Gas Prioes

President Obama Blames YOU for High Gas Prioes

Heritage Foundation ^ | April 7, 2011

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 6:36:55 PM by T.L.Sink

Obama deflected blame for high gas prices by blaming American consumers for their automobile choices. According to the AP, "Obama needled one questioner who asked about gasoline prices. Obama laughingly said: 'If you're complaining about the price of gas and you're only getting 8 miles per gallon you might want to think about a trade-in." For most Americans, however, gas prices are no laughing matter. And for the president to suggest that a taxpayer's inability to buy a new $40,000+ hybrid vehicle (that still requires gas) is the root problem, rather than his price-increasing oil policies is shameful.

Before Obama became president, his personal choice was a Chrysler 300 V8. The predident's campaign vehicle a GMC Yukon averaging 17 mpg. But of course, this is a "do as we say, not as we do" activist administration. But not a word about his anti-drilling policies and costly regulations that are contributing to ever-higher fuel costs!

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Baghdad's Neutron Bomb and America's Nuclear Obama

Baghdad’s Neutron Bomb and America’s Nuclear Obama

Captain May  

Two weeks ago Truth Frequency Network published these photos in the story Micro nuke used in Baghdad?, with the superscript, "In Gunny G’s blog there is an article that is mind blowing. It makes this photo look legit." The article, an interview last year with the Ghost Troop CO, is below. For the interview with graphics, click here.

Introducing Captain Eric H. May, Ghost Troop CO


April 9, 2011 — Few people have heard of the Battle of Baghdad, which ended eight years ago today, let alone its cover-up. They might remember Iraq’s information minister, Mohammad Saeed al-Sahhaf, warning of a surprise awaiting invading U.S. troops if they attacked Saddam International Airport. Later, al-Sahhaf claimed that the Iraqi Republican Guard had slaughtered U.S. troops, and was in control of the entire facility. His claims were mostly true, but were effectively countered by a U.S. military-media campaign of evasions and distortions that switched the subject from the airport action to Private Jessica Lynch, while ridiculing al-Sahhaf as Baghdad Bob.

What came to be called the Battle of Baghdad Cover-Up (BOBCUP) was an illegal deception of the American people, as well as a desecration of the military men who fought and died, only to be pushed into the memory hole by their leaders. Captain Eric H. May, a former U.S. Army intelligence and public affairs officer, was outraged. He responded by declaring himself to be self-activated on a mission of conscience, then investigated and confirmed BOBCUP. Next, he reported his findings to both the Army Inspector General and the mainstream media, only to discover that both were complicit in the cover-up.

He soon realized that the entire U.S. establishment was waging a criminal global war and erecting a criminal homeland state, and he honored his military oath “to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic” by forming and assuming command of Ghost Troop, a cyber-intelligence unit named to honor the ghosts from the Battle of Baghdad. Before long the unit had several hundred members, including veterans of all services, including a former Assistant Secretary of the Navy. *

Initially, Ghost Troop’s mission was to penetrate the propaganda of the mainstream media, government and military; and to provide the American people with the essential military information being withheld from them.


Shortly after the Madrid bombing of 3/11, 2004, Ghost Troop determined that it had been a terror operation carried out by the pro-war Spanish government, then blamed on Arabs in an attempt to turn the war-weary Spanish people into pro-war hawks, just days before national elections. Ghost Troop also saw 9/11, which had kindled U.S. war fever, as false flag terror. They agreed that the U.S. government was routinely telling the public that there was going to be another 9/11 because it meant to carry it out. With grim humor, Ghost Troop began to refer to this future false flag as 9/11-2B. Using their military and media savvy to interdict 9/11-2B became their second mission, and consumed most of their efforts.

Those who know Captain May well consider his mission of conscience to be the stuff of legend. In 2008 The Lone Star Iconoclast in Texas demanded that Congress investigate his uncanny ability to warn the Internet about false flag dangers. He has forecast petrochemical explosions in Southeast Texas six times, each of them possibly an averted false flag attack. In 2006 he exposed a U.S. WMD team that had infiltrated the Texas City refinery area, forcing the local politicians, press and would-be perpetrators to collaborate on a propaganda piece with a dismissive title, but damning details.

There is a growing clamor in the 9/11 truth and patriot movements for Congress to award him the nation’s highest military honor. Dr. James H. Fetzer, a former USMC officer and founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, gave voice to many with his glowing accolade:
“This is a completely brilliant and fully justified recommendation, which I wholeheartedly support. I have not admired anyone during my life as much as I have Captain May. He is a superb analyst and remarkable human being.”
Iconoclast publisher W. Leon Smith credits him with saving the Republic from 9/11-2B with his leadership of Ghost Troop.

Captain May was a vibrant man, a martial arts expert, when he started Ghost Troop. In 2006, after three years of threats from the military, the FBI, et al., he was stricken with ALS, Lou Gehrig’s Disease. Despite the advanced condition of his illness, the now-paralyzed veteran agreed to an interview.

Interviewing Captain Eric H. May, Ghost Troop CO
Antiwar Warrior?

B.J. Sabri: In a 2004 email to Susan Elan of The Journal News, you wrote, “I am pleased see that the antiwar is joining the infowar.” You sound like an antiwar activist. If you really are an antiwar military man, why did you take part in a war that you may have known was based on lies?

Captain May: I was no longer a serving soldier on 9/11, or during the ensuing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. I accepted the official propaganda until the Battle of Baghdad Cover-Up (BOBCUP). After that I became a critic of the wars and the motives behind them.

War Crime and Punishment

BJ: You say, “War is just homicide on a national scale.” Homicide against whom, U.S. military personnel, who are the aggressors, or the people of Iraq, who were attacked? Furthermore, the word homicide sounds ordinary. Why not call it premeditated mass murder? Whatever you call it, the war criminals who planned and carried it out likely will go unpunished. Does this mean the United States government and military are above the law?

Capt. May: No. I realize that my phrase “war is just homicide on a national scale” is cold-blooded, but it’s a professional military man’s objectivity. I agree with you that moral judgments must be made, and elsewhere I’ve judged the Global War on Terror quite harshly. In an Al Jazeerah essay I wrote that the American people have been duped into war crimes, and called for the punishment of our leaders.

Whistleblower Jesse Macbeth

Kim Petersen: I first became acquainted with you when you responded to Dissident Voice pulling an article on allegations of U.S. military atrocities in Iraq by a purported Army Ranger, Jesse Macbeth. Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) disavowed Macbeth, and his claims of service were questioned. Lacking substantiation of his claims, DV pulled the article, and other media outlets followed suit. You decried this as a “hideous failure of American journalism.” Do you still see Macbeth as a victim of swiftboating?

Capt. May: Yes, Jesse Macbeth is a perfect example of a crucial dissident voice who had both courage and a vital message. Just before the swiftboat attacks began, an Arab-American TV show host, Dr. Hesham Tillawi of Current Issues, asked me to review the Macbeth interview. It sounded credible to me, a veteran of four different decades of military service. Macbeth was specific in terminology, tactics and training; and he was familiar with Middle East geography, lifestyle, and attitude. There had already been two local Arizona mainstream media stories about him as a war veteran, neither previously challenged, and he had been drawing benefits from the Veterans Administration.

When IVAW failed to support him, it was because administrator Amanda Braxton, a lifelong civilian, had caved in to the best swiftboating attack since the presidential election of 2004. It was led by men whose records in special operations, propaganda and Republican war rallying made them seem more like mercenaries than media. When I interviewed Braxton, she admitted that she had been frightened into turning on Macbeth. Further, she mentioned that his IVAW cohorts never doubted that he was a war veteran.

Given my familiarity with the military system, I made calls all the way to the top level of the Army, requesting confirmation of claims that Macbeth had never seen the war, and found that the Army didn’t want to comment. Macbeth was attacked simply because he said that we were using SS-style tactics against Muslims.
The alternative media chickened out on a crucial story, allowing the mainstream media and political establishment to cover it up. I wrote an article about it before moving on to other critical stories.

The Battle of Baghdad

KP: I had heard about the Battle of Baghdad at the airport from my colleague BJ Sabri, where reportedly U.S. troops had suffered many losses, but you are the first person I know to have reported about it online. You wrote that it was kept from public consciousness, “hidden under the distraction story of Private Jessica Lynch.” The Battle of Baghdad still has not emerged into public consciousness. Why do you think this is so?

Capt. May: In Ghost Troop, we never left the cover-up unchallenged. In early April of 2007, as the fourth anniversary of the Battle of Baghdad approached, The Lone Star Iconoclast published an interview with me, updating my research on the cover-up. A few days later Al Jazeera published an interview with Iraqi General Mohammed Al-Rawi, who had commanded Saddam’s forces at the airport. A few weeks later the U.S. Congress held hearings about media and military failure to report the truth from Iraq and Afghanistan, especially in the cases of Pvt. Jessica Lynch and Cpl. Pat Tillman.

I believe that Ghost Troop and The Iconoclast gave Al Jazeera and Congress the encouragement they needed to do as much as they did. I believe that the continuing cover-up by the mainstream and alternative media demonstrates that they are in large part controlled by the same pro-war establishment that has orchestrated everything, from 9/11 to the present, to turn the American dream of security into the Muslim nightmare of invasion.

Neutron Bombing Baghdad

BJ: There were many published emails that you wrote where you argue the public’s right to know the truth about the Battle of Baghdad. Since you were a witness to history, and since many accounts confirm that the U.S. used a neutron bomb to the end the battle, I ask you: Did the U.S. use a neutron bomb?

Capt. May: When the Battle of Baghdad occurred, I was at home in Texas, watching events on CNN. At that point I knew that something catastrophic had happened in Saddam International Airport, but I had no idea that it was something nuclear. Over the next couple of years I received many reports from both Arab and Western witnesses who said that we had used a neutron warhead. It wasn’t until I joined the antiwar Camp Casey in 2005, though, that I spoke with numerous witnesses together. They included Army and Marine veterans of the Battle of Baghdad, Arab witnesses and journalists. All their accounts, taken together, convinced me that we had used a neutron bomb. Gen. Al-Rawi confirmed this in his Al Jazeera interview.

Bushmen and Zionazis

BJ: In your Philippic contra George W. Bush, from your 2003 report to Congress, you suggested that he should articulate this message to the nation after the Battle of Baghdad began:
We will not rest until the mission for which they gave their lives is accomplished. We will not stop until we have vanquished tyranny and terror abroad, and brought our heroes home. That will be our tribute to the fallen. God Bless America, Garry Owen, and goodnight.
To me, you kept George Bush’s essence, but just embellished the rhetoric. Can you explain?

Capt. May: It’s likely that Bush himself read my words, since we shared some acquaintances. In the philippic, I attacked him as a lying coward, and to drive the point home I wrote the words that I would have written for him had I been his speechwriter at the time of the Battle of Baghdad. At that point I still made no judgment about whether or not the war in Iraq was legal or illegal. I was just chiding him for not having enough guts to admit facts.

I was writing rhetoric, of course, by putting the best face on the facts as I then believed them to be. Please bear in mind that I was slamming the most powerful man on earth at a time when he had shown himself to be tyrannical and murderous. Anyone who writes a philippic must worry that it will be a fatal act of defiance. A couple of days after I wrote mine, political dissidents in the U.S. and U.K. began to be assassinated. It was the topic of a recent article about them and me.

BJ: What do you think now about the endless wars of what many experts contend is a Zionist-controlled United States government?

Capt. May: I guess I would have to call myself one of those cynical experts. The United States has become a golem, mindlessly carrying out proxy wars for Zionists. Until we awaken as a nation to Israel’s machinations and manipulations against our interests, we shall be in great danger, and we shall be a great danger to the rest of the world.

Nuclear Obama and 9/11-2B

KP: 9/11 provided a pretext for the so-called War on Terror, and Ghost Troop has been vigilant in defending against another 9/11. Does an Obama government affect the need for such vigilance?

Capt. May: Not in the least. In his first year in office, Obama has demonstrated conclusively that he is a puppet for the war cabal. He needs another 9/11-style event to re-energize the dictatorial Homeland and the imperial Global War, which are nothing more than euphemisms for “Vaterland” and “World War.” In Ghost Troop we use an operational codename for this required next 9/11: We call it “9/11-2B” — the 9/11 that the establishment assures us is going “to be.” Just a month ago Obama’s intelligence officials were projecting 9/11-2B in 3 to 6 months. The way we look at it, that means this puppet president wants to set up such an attack before the Congressional elections. Recent emphasis on cyber operations is an indicator that 9/11-2B will entail an attack on the Internet, the only remaining free medium and the greatest impediment to totalitarian rule in the United States.

Tyrants and Terrorists

BJ: Do you really think that these wars are about tyranny and terror? In wider sense, do you think it is about time that the American people stop doing whatever their rulers incite them to do?

Capt. May: I think that these wars are about tyranny and terror, the tyranny and terror of psychopaths who have seized power in the West. They intend to do far worse deeds than they have done. The only way we can stop them is by doing what you suggest: awakening the American people to the perils of being misled by perfidious leaders and an evil establishment. I am proud to be, like you, among the dissident voices engaged in this historic struggle, in which we have transformed the Internet into the printing press of the New American Revolution.

* Ambassador Chase Untermeyer, a rare friend of both Eric May and George HW Bush, volunteered to serve as the Ghost Troop chaplain, thereby earning the GT nickname of Chaplain Chase. He was a unit member, 2003 – 2006. The GT staff considered him to be a double agent, useful to GT if left in place and out of the loop. The unit’s BOBCUP Report contains most of his 2003 correspondence with the captain.


  1. Micro nuke used in Baghdad?, Truth Frequency Network, March 27, 2011
  2. Private Jessica Lynch, the media and the military, BOBCUP Report, July 29, 2003
  3. Time To Investigate Houston Is Now, The Lone Star Iconoclast, March 5, 2008
  4. The Texas Triangle: Terror and Treason, The Lone Star Iconoclast, October 24, 2007
  5. Nuclear Attack Warning Story Dismissed, Galveston County Daily News, February  2, 2006
  6. Captain Eric H. May Deserves Congressional Medal of Honor, The Lone Star Iconoclast, February 2, 2010
  7. Ghost Troop Introduction, America Filed Books,  December 21, 2003
  8. Email to Susan Elan of The Journal News,  BOBCUP Report, November 12, 2004
  9. Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld:Geneva Conventions now, Nuremberg Principles later, Al Jazeerah, July 3, 2006
  10. Battle of Baghdad Cover-Up Four Years Later, The Lone Star Iconoclast, April 2, 2007
  11. US accused of using neutron bombs, Al Jazeera, April 9, 2007
  12. Tillmans, Jessica Lynch to testify on Hill, Army Times, April 23, 2007
  13. Philippic contra George W. Bush, BOBCUP Report, July 15, 2003
  14. Captain Courageous Witnessed: Dr. Kelly Assassinated!, The Lone Star Iconoclast, December 10, 2009
  15. Jesse Macbeth Interview, May 28, 2006
  16. Updating a War Crime Witness: Jesse Macbeth, Political Research, June 5, 2006
  17. BP 7/28 Nuke Plan vs. U.S. Officers Coup, The Lone Star Iconoclast, August 2, 2010
  18. Appointment of Chase Untermeyer as Ghost Troop Chaplain, BOBCUP Report, August 28, 2003
  19. BOBCUP Report (Volumes I – IV), 2003
  20. Captain Eric H. May Index, America First Books, 2003 – Present

Endnote: This interview was originally published by Dissident Voice, on February 24, 2012, as Combating the Disinformation, Psyops, and Cover-ups of the US Military. It was conducted via email by Kim Petersen, co-editor of Dissident Voice, and B. J. Sabri, an Iraqi-American antiwar activist.

Calling Evil By Its Name

Calling Evil By Its Name

Right Side News ^ | 4/102011 | Linda Kimball

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 4:54:37 PM by IbJensen

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, James Taranto describes the growing bloodlust of the progressive left:
" America's liberal left is preoccupied with salacious fantasies of political violence. These take two forms: dreams of leftist insurrection, and nightmares of reactionary bloodshed."
Taranto goes on to report that a sympathetic mainstream media suppresses and/or whitewashes the former type of fantasy while treating the latter as if it reflects reality. (The Politics of Bloodlust, The Wall Street Journal, Jan. 27, 2011)

There are five things we must understand about the West's Progressive Liberal "elite" if we are to make sense of their obvious imbecility, depravity and evil fantasies:
First, they are malignant narcissists who worship themselves as gods . As gods they deny their own proclivity for evil. The delusional self-conception they hold of themselves is of faultlessness and/or moral purity as befits gods. In short, Progressive "elites" are haters of God the Father. They are:

"...lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, revilers, disobedient...ungrateful, unholy, unloving, irreconcilable, malicious gossips, without self-control, brutal, haters of good, treacherous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God..." 2 Tim. 3:2
Second, God the Father Almighty is dead in their dead as their love of truth... and as dead as their individual consciences, or nearly so. When these materialized souls speak of a god, it is a dead god---a god of forces. And when they profess themselves to be speakers of truth they lie, for their words have no fixed meaning............................

Gas prices in 'firing range' of all-time high (Drill Here, Drill Now!)

Gas prices in 'firing range' of all-time high (Drill Here, Drill Now!)

cnn ^ | 4/10/2011 | cnn

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 5:52:06 PM by tobyhill

Gas prices have jumped nearly 20 cents over the past two weeks, approaching the all-time high, according to a survey published Sunday.
The average price of a gallon of self-serve regular is $3.76, the Lundberg Survey found. The previous survey three weeks ago found an average of $3.57.

That means prices are now just 35 cents -- "within firing range" -- of the all-time high of $4.11 set in July 2008, said publisher Trilby Lundberg.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Is it me OR are the news mouthpieces shut Trump up on Obama’s eligibility issues?

Is it me OR are the news mouthpieces shut Trump up on Obama’s eligibility issues?

T Room ^ | April 7, 2011 | Helen Tansey

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 6:14:00 PM by Red Steel

Is it me OR are the news mouthpieces trying their damndest to shut Trump up on Obama’s eligibility issues?

Why on earth is the establishment media trying to keep Trump, hell, a growing majority of American’s, from resolving the simplest and most basic of questions ever asked of anyone? What is going on here?

The simple question -- IS the President eligible, NOT likable, BUT eligible to serve as the Commander in Chief as established by OUR United States Constitution?
It appears these “supposed” journalists are doing all they can to keep Trump from exploring this issue. It seems as though they are doing their best to steer him away from the entire topic. Why? Have you ever seen any journalist EVER behave in this manner? Have you? I sure haven’t.
These peeps want you to believe they vetted Obama. They want you to believe them no matter what. Well, your choice but answer these questions for me before you arrive at a decision.

If he is eligible -
- then tell me why six state Republican and Democrat Attorneys General have yet to investigate citizens Memorandum of Complaints alleging election fraud? Hundreds of citizens from six states filed these Complaints yet not one A’sG once responded to these citizens with an email, a letter or a phone call. Silence.
- then why on earth has he spent nearly $2 MILLION to Perkins Coie Law Firm, who just by coinkydink, also represents the National Democratic Party, to defend and fight off every single eligibility suit that only seeks “discovery” to put this question to rest once and for all?

- then why on earth is it April 7, 2011, a full two and a half years after the election, yet he has yet to produce a legitimately issued birth certificate from an American hospital? All he has produced is a digital copy on a computer of a document that is meaningless and only affirms the man was born. Well, I kinda think we already no he was born.
- then why has every single US Senator and Delegate used precisely the same very “robotic” talking points when constituents ask them to delve into this very simple question? It’s one thing to have the D’s speak in one voice but it’s hardly ever likely to have both choirs singing from the same song sheet.
So, what is really going on here? Have you ever, in all of your life, seen television news journalists work so hard to keep someone from investigating the question of the century?
Check this CNN interview out and you tell me if this “supposed” news reporter isn’t trying her damndest to stop Trump from exploring this very simple question -
h/t Birther
She actually tries to personalize it -- my work is all that is needed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that…Barry was ALIVE in Hawaii as a teenager! Insane!
She shows a clip of his friends talking about what a swell guy Barry, this is the name he went by when attending school in Hawaii, was when they knew him. What do these people have to do with solving the question of Obama’s eligibility? Not a damned thing! That’s what! Yet, you are expected to take CNN’s word for doing research, credible research, into this question. What chutzpah!

Then checkout MSNBC’s Morning Joe, listen carefully to what former Governor Rendell says about Trump diving into the eligibility question at the beginning of the clip -
Did you here hear former Pennsylvania Governor Rendell say “where Donald loses me, and, again, I love him, but where he loses me is when he gets into this birther stuff. He’s too smart and understands that’s bs!” and the host, Willie Geist, responds to Rendell by saying “we’re trying to get him to come around on that.”
So Rendell is referring to 30% of the electorate as stupid? My fellow Pennsylvanian’s, how’s it feel to have your former Governor calling ya stupid! What’s that saying about “three fingers pointing backatcha”? Just sayin.
And this Geist character says “WE” are trying to shut Trump down on this birther deal! Who is “WE”? Who the hell do these people think they are? MSNBC is owned by GE. Is Immelt trying to shut Trump down? This is the same Immelt that owns majority share in TEPCO whose four reactors are in full-blown meltdown poisoning the air, water and land in Japan, Western USA and British Columbia, Canada. And we are supposed to what -- BELIEVE HIM? Why? Because he has money? Rubbish!

Trump is doing what any thinking American should be doing -- demanding FORENSIC PROOF OF OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY!!! Any and all who don’t are either ignorant, don’t give a chit, hiding the truth, are being blackmailed or they are part and parcel of one big a$$ huge conspiracy. That simple.
Btw, Hey Rendell, I think you are as dumb as a box of rocks! Moron.
Someone from the Council on Foreign Relations better get their chit together and clue Trump in on your fascist New World Order post haste. Obviously, you haven’t been able to shmooze or blackmail or threaten him…yet!

Excerpted. Videos at website...

When Barry Became Barack (Newsweak runs interference)

When Barry Became Barack (Newsweak runs interference)

Newsweek ^ | March 22, 2008 | Richard Wolffe, Jessica Ramirez, Jeffrey Bartholet

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 6:01:02 PM by E. Pluribus Unum

Barry Obama decided that he didn't like his nickname. A few of his friends at Occidental College had already begun to call him Barack (his formal name), and he'd come to prefer that. The way his half sister, Maya, remembers it, Obama returned home at Christmas in 1980, and there he told his mother and grandparents: no more Barry.  Obama recalls it slightly differently, but in the same basic time frame.

He believes he told his mom he wanted to be called Barack when she visited him in New York the following summer. By both accounts, it seemed that the elder relatives were reluctant to embrace the change. Maya recalls that Obama's maternal grandparents, who had played a big role in raising him, continued long after that to call him by an affectionate nickname, "Bar." "Not just them, but my mom, too," says Obama.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

1st Quran, now this? Controversial pastor reveals plans if Muhammad found 'guilty' next


1st Quran, now this?

Controversial pastor reveals plans if Muhammad found 'guilty' next

Posted: April 10, 2011
4:08 pm Eastern
By Drew Zahn
© 2011 WorldNetDaily

Pastor Terry Jones
The Florida pastor whose public torching of the Quran sparked violent Muslim protests in the Mideast told WND Jerusalem Bureau Chief Aaron Klein that an effigy of Islam's Prophet Muhammad may be next.
Pastor Terry Jones of the Dove World Outreach Center of Gainesville, Fla., was speaking with Klein on the latter's "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio" on WABC 770 AM in New York City when the host asked if there was any truth to the rumor that Jones' church would put Muhammad "on trial," like it did with the Quran.

"There is that possibility," Jones said, before qualifying, "it is definitely not a possibility in the near future."
Nonetheless, he continued: "As far as judging Muhammad, it would take place in the same way. We would try to obtain experts on both sides of the bench, and if Muhammad was found innocent … then we would issue a public apology to Islam, to the Quran, to the followers of Muhammad for our actions at insulting [them]. If he was found guilty, then we would do in the same manner as the Quran burning. We would offer probably four or five different forms of punishment, and then the form of punishment that the people voted upon, that would be the punishment that would be executed."
Klein asked what kind of "punishment" Jones had in mind.

"Probably they would be forms similar to International Judge the Quran Day," Jones said. "On that day we had four forms of punishment – they were burning, grounding, shredding and facing of a firing squad. We would probably pick some of those kinds of forms, and if Muhammad was found guilty … we would put together some type of picture or some type of dummy figure to represent him, and then the execution would be done on that particular object we created."

Get Aaron Klein's new bestseller, "The Manchurian President," at WND's Superstore!
Audio of the interview can be heard below:

(Story continues below)

Read more: 1st Quran, now this?

Donald Trump Shows Republicans How to Beat Barack Obama in 2012

Donald Trump Shows Republicans How to Beat Barack Obama in 2012
The Rush Limbaugh Show ^ | April 09, 2011 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 2:54:43 PM by RobinMasters

RUSH: Mentor, Ohio. Matt, you're next on Open Line Friday. Welcome, sir, hello.
CALLER: Hey, Rush, it's an honor to speak with you. I love you, my family loves you, and you're the foundation of everything that I am.
RUSH: Whoa! Thank you very much, sir.

CALLER: You're welcome. I'm well educated, well researched. One of the questions I have, something that really frustrates me, is this "smoke screen" of Obama's birth. Everybody's screaming about his birth certificate, and all these other documents -- and, you know, it's all irrelevant. His father was a loyal British subject at the time of his birth, and his mother was too young to qualify. It's documented fact. So I don't know why everybody is running around trying to prove anything. Any document he puts forward is a fraudulent document.

RUSH: Well, I'll tell you why it's important. There are two reasons why it's important. Number one, he's got a grandmother or aunt in Kenya who said she saw him born there.
That's number one. Number two, aside from all of that, what Donald Trump is really doing -- and as I pointed out yesterday -- is Donald Trump is providing a lesson on how to beat Barack Obama. Donald Trump is showing that the way to do that is you go after these people. Not just Obama. You go after the left. You go after the Democrat Party. You don't get timid, you don't act defensive and you don't act afraid. You just go after them.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Did Sarah Palin just join Donald Trump as a ‘birther’? (CSM goes all in for Obama)

Did Sarah Palin just join Donald Trump as a ‘birther’? (CSM goes all in for Obama)
The Christian Science Monitor ^ | April 10, 2011 | Brad Knickerbocker

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 3:28:08 PM by 2ndDivisionVet

Forget primary elections and party caucuses. In many ways, the long, strange trip to picking major party presidential candidates is one of self-selection.
How so? Like how they focus attention on themselves in ways that appear – how to put this delicately – obsessively weird.
Which brings us, quite logically, to Donald Trump and Sarah Palin.
The billionaire developer and reality show star has been going on and on about President Obama’s place of birth, claiming now that he’s sent investigators to Hawaii to find out the truth. And now he’s gotten into a snit with a New York Times columnist over the subject.
Hello? Did Trump not think that his hometown newspaper might find what seems at the moment to be his main campaign issue…obsessively weird?
In her typically funny op-ed column, Gail Collins at the New York Times had had it with Trump.

“In a potential Republican field that includes Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich, it’s hard to come up with a line of attack loopy enough to stand out from the pack. But darned if Trump didn’t manage to find one,” she wrote the other day.
Then she hammered Trump on the two things he’s best known for.
“Trump’s main argument for why he should be taken seriously as a presidential contender is his business success. Has Obama ever hosted a long-running reality series?

Owned a bankruptcy-bound chain of casinos? Put his name on a flock of really unattractive high-rise apartment buildings? No! … ‘Celebrity Apprentice’ is widely regarded as terrible and cheesy programming, but, actually, it has its moments. I recently saw an episode in which a former top model had a serious discussion with a fellow competitor about whether this was the 20th century or the 21st.....
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Auto Industry Fights Obama Admin's Effort to Force Corn Ethanol on U.S.

Auto Industry Fights Obama Admin's Effort to Force Corn Ethanol on U.S.
Daily Tech ^ | April 8, 2011 2:24 PM | Jason Mick (Blog)

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 5:07:01 PM by Ernest_at_the_Beach
New legislation would force virtually all cars to run on ethanol

The Obama administration and Democrats in Congress are facing resistance from the auto industry about a controversial proposal that would force consumers to use more ethanol in a bid to reduce fossil fuels consumption.

I. What's in the Bill?

The new bill, The Biofuels Expansion Act of 2011, has a number of provisions, but among its most controversial are efforts to expand government spending on ethanol and force ethanol on consumers.

Sponsored by Senators Tom Harkin (D-Iowa); Tim Johnson (D-South Dakota); Amy Klobuchar (D/"Farmer-Labor Party"- Minnesota); and Al Franken (D/"Farmer-Labor Party"-Minnesota), the bill could massively benefit corn farmers in the Midwest, but may not be so rosy for the rest of the country.

Under its proposals, government spending on ethanol would leap from $50M USD in 2012 to $350M USD by 2016.  The government would also provide loan guarantees to construct new ethanol pipelines.

But most importantly, the bill would force 90 percent of automobiles sold by 2016 to capable of running on an E85 fuel blend -- fuel that is 85 percent ethanol, and 15 percent gas.

II.  The Good

There are some positives about the bill.  The bill could promote the growth of cellulosic ethanol research and production.
 Cellulosic ethanol has few downsides other than the cost.  It comes from waste, is completely renewable, has a net harvest-to-pump reduction in green house gases, nitrogen, and sulfur emissions.

And the bill could promote other non-corn biofuels such as algae, something the Navy has been actively dabbling in for several years.

In our past discussions with alternative biofuel companies like Coskata, most expressed that they didn't need subsidies to survive and eventually be profitable, but that subsidies could accelerate the process.

III. The Bad.....................

Italian Historian Says Homosexuality Destroyed Rome

Italian Historian Says Homosexuality Destroyed Rome

The Eponymous Flower ^ | 04/10/11 | Tancred

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 4:29:58 PM by 0beron

Editor: They've done quite a job on the Catholic Church already.
Does anyone remember when Richard Nixon discussed one of the redeeming features of the Soviet Union as being its antipathy of homosexuals when he was talking in his office about Archie Bunker, said exactly the same thing? [Warning, fowl language, blasphemy] At first he starts demurring, saying he has no moral objections to homosexuality, then goes on to say that the immorality actually destroys societies. It's also interesting that Nixon's off-color comments are made much of when figures like Gandhi and Voltaire get away with it. Of course, apologists for Richard Nixon won't defend what Nixon was saying, they'll just argue that times, and morals, have changed, and if you know anything about principles, it's an indefensible position to take, but anyway.

Of course, never mind Richard Nixon, despite the fact that he's correct. Let another voice speak by way of a message from Bminormass on '", who said in his book, "Life is Worth Living" on P. 260, where he quotes the sociologist, Dr. Sorokin, who said:

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

14th Amendment Birthright Citizenship & The Law of Statelessness

14th Amendment Birthright Citizenship & The Law of Statelessness

ConstitutionallySpeaking ^ | April 10, 2011 | Linda Melin

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 4:00:04 PM by patlin

The definition of “natural born” comes from the common law of nations. Under the law of nations, all treaties and the laws of the foreign nations must be considered if a child is born on foreign soil. Therefore the fundamental rule for NBC is “exclusive allegiance to the United States” at birth. According the US Government, to answer the question, is one born without the soil (jus soli) a natural born citizen, we must ask ourselves this question…If the US denied citizenship to a child born abroad, would that act of the US government leave the child stateless?

Take for example, George Romney who was born in Mexico because his refuge parents, who were mormons, were being persecuted in the US. George’s parents never changed their citizenship. They never renounced their US citizenship & took Mexican citizenship. Under the citizenship laws of Mexico at the time, George Romney was born an alien/foreigner as Mexican law did not recognize him as a citizen by the mere fact that he was born on their soil. It was “jus sanguinis” & the law of “parens patriae” (the jurisdiction to make decisions) under the law of nations that governed George Romney’s status at birth. Therefore, if the US had denied citizenship to little George, he literally would have been left stateless because the foreign nation in which he was born never claimed him as a member/citizen of their society. His “exclusive” allegiance at birth was to the United States.

This is the same for children born to 2 citizen parents in the military, no matter where they are born. Vattel, Bk1, sec 217: For the same reasons also, children born out of the country, in the armies of the state, or in the house of its minister at a foreign court, are reputed born in the country; for a citizen who is absent with his family, on the service of the state, but still dependent on it, and subject to its jurisdiction, cannot be considered as having quitted its territory.

During the hearings and testimony on S.Res. 511, the revisionists brought in 2 highly respected revisionist constitutional lawyers to obfuscate the truth by using English feudal law. Feudal law is not common law. It is the law of the Sovereign King. It is statute law, not natural law. Had McCain or any of the other spineless GOP establishment known their history, they would have refuted that resolution and stood firm on the law of their birthright. This is especially disturbing to me because of the stress it is causing our men & women in uniform who are temporarily stationed overseas. By saying that they are subject to the citizenship laws of foreign nations is ludicrous and absurd.

Since 1920 & the right of women to vote, our country’s basic foundation, the family as “One” standing under one allegiance, has been usurped by statute law. Women already had citizenship. Voting is not a fundamental right, it is a privilege. I am a woman & I am sick of the feminist movement. There are certain things in nature that are vital to the preservation of a society/nation and that is unified allegiance of all households. When a man & woman get married they become “One” in the eyes of the law and this includes allegiance to the society in which they have their main domicile. Supreme Court Justice James Wilson, 1791:

[T]hat important and respectable, though small and sometimes neglected establishment, which is denominated a family…[The family is] the principle of the community; it is that seminary, on which the commonwealth, for its manners as well as its numbers, must ultimately depend. As its establishment is the source, so its happiness is the end, of every institution of government, which is wise and good

[T]he most important consequence of marriage is, that the husband and the wife become in law only one person… Upon this principle of union, almost all the other legal consequences of marriage depend. This principle, sublime and refined, deserves to be viewed and examined on every side.
Children are a consequence of marriage, therefore they become in the eyes of the law part of that “One” union.

Jus sanguinis” & the law of “parens patriae” and the effect of statelessness should children find themselves born without the soil (jus soli) of the parents is the common law of nations.

The 14th Amendment requires “exclusive allegiance” to the United States either at birth or at the time of naturalization. All others born on US soil are citizens by statute because the status of the foreign parents are governed by Treaty, not by nature.

Harvard Law agrees with my assessment. The Harvard & Michigan Law Reviews used by SCOTUS are copyrighted and thus I am not able to publish the pdf’s. Those with Hein-online access will be able to access the entire documents:

See also the official government notices published nationwide by the Buchanan Administration. These documents were the founding documents for the 1866 Civil Rights Act which later was Constitutionalized as the 14th Amendment, the 1868 Expatriation Act(also still law, it is the authority for the oath of allegiance all naturalized citizens must take) as well as the 1870 Act passed to enforce the 14th Amendment and the basis of all citizenship treaties with all foreign nations since then. Click the link for each pdf file to save a copies of them. The state legislators need these documents to enforce their new election laws pertaining to constitutional eligibility:

Audio- Obama in 2001: The Redistribution of Wealth is akin to "Political and Economic Justice"

Audio- Obama in 2001: The Redistribution of Wealth is akin to "Political and Economic Justice"

Pundit Press ^ | 4/10/11 | Aurelius

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 4:09:15 PM by therightliveswithus

Candidate and now President Obama has been followed by numerous accusations of socialistic policies and beliefs. For the most part, the President has dodged these questions as best he can, changing around his public stance several times.
And now there's this. Audio from a 2001 interview of Barack Obama discussing his view points on the redistribution of wealth...
Here is a short transcript:

Obama- But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as people tried to characterize the Warren court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. 

It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

President Urges Consumers to “Get used to Higher Gas Prices”

President Urges Consumers to “Get used to Higher Gas Prices”

A Semi-News/Semi-Satire from AzConservative ^ | 9 April 2011 | John Semmens

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 3:51:29 PM by John Semmens

Calling higher prices “a key incentive for conserving,” President Obama told an audience of 500 employees at the Gamesa Technology Corp., a wind turbine manufacturing plant in Pennsylvania, that “we need to get used to higher gas prices for the sake of our environment.”
“There is no gain without at least a little pain
,” the President argued. “Paying a few dollars more at the pump will encourage people to cut back on unnecessary trips and use public transit when they have to travel. If we’re going to save the planet we all have to make sacrifices.”

As an example of what a person could do, the President cited the fact that “I work from a home office. I’m not driving to work, burning hydrocarbons, adding to traffic congestion and air pollution. And when I find I do have to go out I never drive alone. I always carpool with a couple of bodyguards.

If others would just do the same even if only for one or two days a week we’d make a significant contribution to solving our environmental problems. So, just think of higher fuel prices as kind of a ‘stick’ to help persuade more people to make the changes in their behavior that are required to clean the air.”
“Of course, the upside for you here at Gamesa is that when people can’t afford the high cost of fossil fuels they’ll be buying your products,” Obama pointed out. “That’ll mean more jobs and more profits for you.”

Meanwhile, back in Washington, Republicans warned that high energy prices could lead to a “double dip” recession. Senator John Cornyn (R-Tex) reminded the President that “higher prices for energy means businesses will have to make cuts elsewhere—maybe hire fewer workers or lay off some they already employ. If consumers have to pay more for gas they’ll have less to spend on other things. The businesses that sell these other things will have lower revenues with which to employ people. This can only make a weak economy worse.”


Was Barack Obama Planted? From J. Hansen

Was Barack Obama Planted?
From J. Hansen

This is long, but very important and worth the time to read it.
This election has me very worried. So many things to consider.
I watch all the news channels, jumping from one to another. I must say this drives my husband crazy. But, I feel if you view MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News, you might get some middle ground to work with. About six months ago, I started thinking— “where did the money come from for Obama”. I have four daughters who went to College, and we were middle class, and money was tight. We (including my girls) worked hard and there were lots of student loans.
I started looking into Obama’s life.
Around 1979 Obama started college at Occidental in California. He is very open about his two years at Occidental; he tried all kinds of drugs and was wasting his time but, even though he had a brilliant mind, did not apply himself to his studies.
“Barry” (that was the name he used all his life) during this time had two roommates, Muhammad Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, both from Pakistan.

During the summer of 1981, after his second year in college, he made a “round the world” trip. Stopping to see his mother in Indonesia, next Hyderabad in India, three weeks in Karachi, Pakistan where he stayed with his roommate’s family, then off to Africa to visit his father’s family.
My question – Where did he get the money for this trip? Nether I, nor any one of my children would have had money for a trip like this when they where in college. When he came back he started school at Columbia University in New York. It is at this time he wants everyone to call him Barack – not Barry.
Do you know what the tuition is at Columbia? It’s not cheap! to say the least. Where did he get money for tuition? Student Loans? Maybe. After Columbia, he went to Chicago to work as a Community Organizer for $12,000. a year. Why Chicago? Why not New York? He was already living in New York.
By “chance” he met Antoin “Tony” Rezko, born in Aleppo Syria, and a real estate developer in Chicago. Rezko has been convicted of fraud and bribery this year. Rezko, was named “Entrepreneur of the Decade” by the Arab-American Business and Professional Association”.
About two years later, Obama entered Harvard Law School. Do you have any idea what tuition is for Harvard Law School? Where did he get the money for Law School? More student loans? After Law school, he went back to Chicago. Rezko offered him a job, which he turned down. But, he did take a job with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland. Guess what? They represented “Rezar” which is Rezko’s firm. Rezko was one of Obama’s first major financial contributors when he ran for office in Chicago. In 2003, Rezko threw an early fundraiser for Obama which Chicago Tribune reporter David Mendelland claims was instrumental in providing Obama with “seed money” for his U.S. Senate race.
In 2005, Obama purchased a new home in Kenwood District of Chicago for $1.65 million (less than asking price). With ALL those Student Loans – Where did he get the money for the property? On the same day Rezko’s wife, Rita, purchased the adjoining empty lot for full price. The London Times reported that Nadhmi Auchi, an Iraqi-born Billionaire loaned Rezko $3.5 million three weeks before Obama’s new home was purchased. Obama met Nadhmi Auchi many times with Rezko.
Now, we have Obama running for President. Valerie Jarrett, was Michele Obama’s boss. She is now Obama’s chief advisor and he does not make any major decisions without talking to her first. Where was Jarrett born? Ready for this? Shiraz, Iran. Do we see a pattern here? Or, am I going crazy?
On May 10, 2008 The Times reported, Robert Malley advisor to Obama was “sacked” after the press found out he was having regular contacts with “Hamas “, which controls Gaza and is connected with Iran. This past week, buried in the back part of the papers, Iraqi newspapers reported that during Obama’s visit to Iraq, he asked their leaders to do nothing about the war until after he is elected, and he will “Take care of things”.
Oh, and by the way, remember the college roommates that where born in Pakistan? They are in charge of all those “small” Internet campaign contributions for Obama. Where is that money coming from? The poor and middle class in this country? Or could it be from the Middle East?
And the final bit of news. On September 7, 2008, The Washington Times posted a verbal slip that was made on “This Week” with George Stephanapoulos. Obama on talking about his religion said, “My Muslim faith”. When questioned, “he made a mistake”. Some mistake!
All of the above information I got on line. If you would like to check it – Wikipedia, encyclopedia, Barack Obama; Tony Rezko; Valerie Jarrett: Daily Times – Obama visited Pakistan in 1981; The Washington Times – September 7, 2008; The Times May 10, 2008.
Now the BIG question – If I found out all this information on my own, why haven’t all of our “intelligent” members of the press been reporting this?
A phrase that keeps ringing in my ear – “Beware of the enemy from within.”
Donate to
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Email
Article Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files,
Highest Quality Live Programs

Revealed: Obama's CT Social Security # Traced To John Paul Ludwig (Lived CT-Died HI)

Revealed: Obama's CT Social Security # Traced To John Paul Ludwig (Lived CT-Died HI)

Political Forum ^ | 3/14/2011 | Apuzzo

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 3:34:43 PM by bkopto

This news is breaking: This is bad news for Obama.
This is what we know so far. We get more info on Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890, had CT SSN obtained in 1976 and died in HI around 1981. There are 2 SS numbers for him and records show him dying in 2 different states: CA and HI around 1981.

The reason this is important, is because there is a similar fact pattern to Obama. Barack Obama is residing today in the White House, using CT SS number 042-68-4425, issued in CT in and around March 1977 to an elderly individual named John Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890, who is presumed dead and whose death was either never reported to the SS administration or reported and deleted from the database by someone.
Obama's maternal grandmother Madelyn Dunham, worked as a part-timer or volunteer in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse. Thus she would have access to the estate files of anyone who died there.

Thus if the elderly man originally from CT died intestate in Hawaii with no known relatives, Grandma Dunham would have known this person is a prime candidate to steal the SSN of since there would be no known surviving family worrying about the death benefit from SSN and that the benefit was not likely applied for and thus SSA did not know he died.
Thus the SSN remained active for the deceased person and Obama could "adopt" it as his own. This is a clear case of identity theft at the federal level.
This is what we know about Ludwig:
In 1924, Jean Paul Ludwig worked for Senator Reed of PA, in Washington DC.
On the ship manifest of ‘Leviathan’, he listed Senator Reed in Washington...

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Social mobility drive to track us to age of 30

Social mobility drive to track us to age of 30

Daily Mail ^ | 31st March 2011 | Daily Mail Reporter

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 2:17:30 PM by bronxville

Everyone will have their educational and work achievements tracked from birth to the age of 30 under radical plans to improve social mobility.
Ministers will unveil seven new ‘Life Chance Indicators’ next week as part of a plan to help children from poorer homes do better.

The indicators measure everything from a person’s weight at birth to their university achievements and earnings at the age of 30.
Five-year-olds will be tested for their ‘readiness for school’, including their academic ability and ability to listen.

The measures will be used to judge whether initiatives such as the Sure Start programme to help children from poorer homes are effective or should be scrapped.

In most cases the indicators will draw on existing data, although some new figures will have to be collected. Ministers will pledge to publish an annual report charting progress – or the lack of it – on each of the measures, and to take action where improvement is slow.
Read more:

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Trump As President

Trump As President
Flopping Aces ^ | 04-10-11 | James Raider

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 2:02:20 PM by Starman417
TRUMP - The analysis begins in earnest as it should. Obama has announced his reelection campaign from the vantage and with the advantage of the bully pulpit. Contenders are lining up as America as America struggles through a long recession, yearning for strong decisive leadership.
Donald Trump has teased the electorate in the past, pretending to seriously consider a run for the White House. This Presidential election finds Republican support for some politically green but very appealing potential candidates. These may well bide their time and wait until 2016 before displaying the audacity to become pretenders to the seat in the Oval Office. Past analysis such as Obama – The First Tell, was helpful in anticipating a President Elect’s road ahead. Trump’s superficial relationship with the voting public has been distorted by its inevitable distance from an unusual celebrity billionaire. Donald Trump has delighted in each moment of attention he has been able to attract by jumping onto the spotlight dot. His reach into our communal consciousness begs a little scrutiny.
• Trump is not ideologically anchored. This moves his appeal factor positively as he will carry little obligation to either political party. He will also present a more refreshing alternative to a public tired of Washington indebtedness to special interests. At the very least, he will be more honest with how he feels, and he will easily be more knowledgeable with on all topics than what we have seen subjected to since the last Presidential election.
• A lack of ideological fervor also makes it more likely that from his perch in the Oval Office he would be a pragmatist. Unlike the embarrassingly far “left” rooted individuals choking the Obama Administration, Trump would most probably pluck the best talent, however it might present itself, wherever he could find it, and in whatever political flavor it might be drenched.
• His insecurities mean his ego can be stroked to get his favor and attention, but he isn't narcissistic. In Trump’s case the insecurities also suggest that he is driven to succeed.
• Trump will surround himself with experienced talent, and it is unlikely that he will punt important decisions down the road, or to someone else, unlike Obama who is clearly controlled by his handlers and seems ready, willing and able, to have others take care of business. If and when America elects Trump, he will be the President, NOT one of his handlers.
(Excerpt)

The Importance of Supporting Trump

The Importance of Supporting Trump
 By Jim O'Neill Full Story
“...if it were not an issue, why wouldn’t he just solve it?  I wish he would, because if he doesn’t, it’s one of the greatest scams in the history of politics and…history, period.”  Donald Trump regarding Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS

Boehner’s Boner ~ I fear we have yet again been duped by the Democrats and the GOP party establishment

Boehner’s Boner
 By Timothy Birdnow Full Story
Many conservative pundits - most notably Andrew Stiles at National Review Online - are touting the budget deal as a great victory for the GOP. Sorry, but I beg to differ. I fear we have yet again been duped by the Democrats and the GOP party establishment. Let me take the Stiles piece and deconstruct it line by line.

An Open Letter to Herman Cain »

An Open Letter to Herman Cain

An Open Letter to Herman Cain »

IS HE A SUPPORTER OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION OR JUST ANOTHER POLITICIAN? by Neil Turner Herman Cain was born in 1945 and was the chairman and CEO of Godfather’s Pizza. He is also a radio...
April 10 2011 / No comment / Read More »

For Those Wishing to Send Information to Donald Trump » ~ PLEASE SEND IT BY CERTIFIED MAIL by Sharon Rondeau


by Sharon Rondeau

The atrium of the Trump Tower in New York City spans five floors, a bridge which transcends a pool, a waterfall, skylight and many specialty shops.
(Apr. 9, 2011) — Many of our readers are asking how to send information to Donald Trump’s team to answer his request for more information regarding the “natural born Citizen” issue raised during yesterday’s meeting in New York City.
The Post & Email has spoken to Jeff, one of the attendees at the meeting, who said that he believes he has “more than enough” information to enlighten Mr. Trump and his team on the subject.
However, there has been an overwhelming response to Jeff’s “homework” assignment, and those who have performed extensive research on the origins and meaning of “natural born Citizen” should be encouraged to share their work with the Trump team.

The Camelot Cover-up Continues

The Camelot Cover-up Continues ^ | April 10, 2011 | David Stokes

Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 12:28:58 PM by Kaslin

Gene Healy, author of The Cult of the Presidency—America’s Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power, suggests: “In an age when Americans periodically swoon for imperial presidents, a little sacred cow-tipping would be a public service.” The made-for-television mini-series, The Kennedys, recently airing on ReelzChannel is a case in point.
Unceremoniously cancelled earlier this year by The History Channel as not a good “fit” for “the History brand,” the project was controversial almost from its inception. This had to do completely with the hypersensitivity of a vast array of myth-guardians who stand perpetual watch over the Kennedy family, as well as the career and legacy of America’s 35th President. And these members of the Camelot cabal pretty much wrote the book on branding.

I have long been a student of the Kennedy era and I wrote a Master’s thesis on it many years ago while working on my political science degree. And frankly, I have yet to see a scenario or fact presented in the broadcast that has not appeared in the history available at any public library or bookstore. I find myself wondering why the fuss?
The John F. Kennedy portrayed in this new series is a real life character—warts and all. Greg Kinnear does an admirable job with the JFK persona, as does Katie Holmes with Jackie Kennedy. Is it all flattering? Certainly not. But JFK comes off as a much more sympathetic character in this current portrayal than might have been expected after hearing all the advance hype and horror. In fact, in my opinion the production spends a tortured amount of time showing him as a man much more “conflicted” about the flaws, now well known, than he really was.

I can’t for the life of me see why The History Channel blackballed the miniseries, when they regularly show things like Monster Quest, Swamp People, and Clash of the Cavemen. You know, real serious history stuff. Not to mention the fact, that the network regularly peddles speculative conspiracy theories, from novelist Brad Meltzer’s Decoded, to several programs dealing with various theories on—ironically—the Kennedy assassination.

Of course, there was a very real conspiracy behind The History Channel’s decision to dump the miniseries. It doesn’t take Glenn Beck’s blackboard to connect those dots. But after watching The Kennedys, I am completely at a loss to figure out why anyone seriously found the material objectionable. The broadcast broke no new ground.
Likely, the keepers of the fictional Camelot flame simply didn’t want another reminder of the vast disconnect between calculated and conjured myth in the wake of Mr. Kennedy’s tragic death and actual reality. Whether one reads a good book about the Kennedy years or watches The Kennedys on ReelzChannel, one thing is clear—there were potential ethical and moral time bombs threatening his presidency. And there is a credible case to be made that had Kennedy lived beyond that fateful fall day in 1963, and had he managed to be reelected in 1964 (not at all a sure thing), he may not have survived a second term, politically.

That’s right. As Hugh Sidey suggested before his death in 2005—the same Hugh Sidey, who as an editor at Time Magazine during the Kennedy years, was also a Camelot insider—JFK’s various and sundry moral, ethical, and judgmental, pecadillos might very well have led to his actual impeachment.
The Kennedy administration could very well have been on the road to its own kind of Watergate.
From the improper use of the FBI in surveillance and investigation in matters not at all related to national security, to misuse of the Secret Service, to his affair with a mistress of a major crime boss, with its obvious compromises, Mr. Kennedy played by his own rules against the backdrop of the last gasp of an age of media mercy. He lived on the edge, from his monumental sexual addiction, to his experimentation with illicit drugs, to his dependence on substances that, while not illegal, were questionable—John F. Kennedy’s time was running out. People were always covering for him and clearly many still are.

But was it only a matter of time before someone broke rank?
If Watergate taught us anything, it was that it is hard to keep a lid on a big story—even in the White House. Had John F. Kennedy lived and had his shortcomings been investigated and written with Woodward-Bernstein-like passion, it is not far-fetched that he may not have been reelected in 1964. And if he did manage to win that race, and investigators did their jobs, JFK might very well have been impeached or pressured to resign.
Then again, that may be fantasy, because it was unlikely that Ben Bradlee, editor of the Washington Post in those days, and an inbred Kennedy crony, would have allowed any such story to go forward. At any rate, it all went away that sad November day and we are left with a legend that does history, not to mention the American people, a disservice.
And because what could have been a major broadcasting event has been dispatched to cable television’s backwater, it seems that the cover-up continues.

That “brief and shining moment” that never really was, lives on.