Proof. It Was in Front of Our Faces. What follows is the story of an amazing revelation.

Proof. It Was in Front of Our Faces. What follows is the story of an amazing revelation.
obamasgarden ^ | 4/26/11 | obamasgarden

Posted on Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:24:57 AM by American Dream 246

But, what follows tops it all. What follows should be the story of the century, in my opinion. What follows is the proof from the former Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, M.D, that Obama did NOT have a valid or official “original birth certificate” just days before the election.

And, it was right in front of our faces all along.

“Date Filed by Registrar” vs. “Date Accepted by State Registrar”


Not to rehash things, but the story really does begin here. These two terms have plagued the Obama birth certificate issue from the beginning and have fueled many questions about Obama’s posted alleged ‘certified copy’ of a ‘Certification of Live Birth.’ For example, what do they mean in terms of the legal veracity behind a copy of a birth certificate?

What is the difference between the “Registrar” and the “State Registrar?” When would it be important that a record states whether or not it has been accepted by the State Registrar?

Obama’s alleged ‘Certification of Live Birth’ shows only the ‘Date Filed by Registrar’ as opposed to the ‘Date Accepted by State Registrar,’ that’s why many people, including myself, have been curious whether that matters. By now, I am sure most of us are aware that Alvin T. Onaka is the ‘State Registrar’ in Hawaii, but who is the ‘Registrar’ to which Obama’s alleged COLB refers?

(Excerpt) Read more at obamasgarden.wordpress.com ...