Tuesday, August 09, 2011

Citizen Responds to Third Circuit Court En Banc Ruling Against Motion to Vacate| The Post & Email

Citizen Responds to Third Circuit Court En Banc Ruling Against Motion to Vacate| The Post & Email:

"The Obama supporters and the government are hiding behind technicalities of law that might apply in innocent civil situations where the appointees are not to blame for their appointment.

That is not the case here. This is a criminal conspiracy case with the appointees actively involved in the unlawful activity and who are themselves responsible for their own condition. To say that their appointments and actions are protected by law is a mockery of truth, justice, and the rule of law.

It is the criminal corrupt nature of both the appointment and the appointee that is at issue and why there is an obvious conflict of interest in this case. If everyone involved in these appointments is knowingly acting without lawful authority, which includes Obama, the Congress and the appointees themselves, then what you have a is a criminal racketeering enterprise going on to deprive the citizens of the rule of law for personal gain.

To say that this is permitted by the de-facto doctrine is an insane analysis of the situation and overturns the entire concept of natural sovereignty and a government base upon the rule of law."

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note:
The 'Reader Responses; shown on many posts/articles are almost always worthwhile reading.

Often, the comments by readers enhance the posted article greatly, and are informative and interesting.

Hopefully, all will remember to read the reader comments, and post their own as well.
Thanx
*****