The New American ^ | March 25th | Raven Clabough
Posted on Friday, April 01, 2011 3:02:31 PM by Halfmanhalfamazing
President Obama's actions in Libya were already suspicious for a number of reasons. First, during Obama's presidential campaign, he asserted that his priority was to get America out of the two wars it was already fighting. Second, Obama was a staunch critic of the Bush administration for unconstitutionally embarking on a war without congressional approval — an action of which President Obama is now guilty. Finally, as the economy is teetering on collapse, one would assume the last thing the President would want is to have to fund a third war.
And yet here we are. However, once we delve into some of the key players behind the President's ultimate decision to embark on military action in Libya, things become clearer, and more frustrating.
President Obama cited the "Responsibility to Protect" doctrine as a justification for bombing Libya. The initiative is a doctrine of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. The American Thinker explains:
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
*****
Gunny G Blog @ WP
http://www.GunnyG.WorPress.com/
**********
FACEBOOK-GunnyG
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000763008392
**********
Gunny G @Blogspot.com
http://gunnyg.blogspot.com/
***********
*****
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note:
The 'Reader Responses; shown on many posts/articles are almost always worthwhile reading.
Often, the comments by readers enhance the posted article greatly, and are informative and interesting.
Hopefully, all will remember to read the reader comments, and post their own as well.
Thanx
*****