Was Barack Obama Planted?
From J. Hansen
10-9-8
This is long, but very important and worth the time to read it.
This election has me very worried. So many things to consider.
I watch all the news channels, jumping from one to another. I must say this drives my husband crazy. But, I feel if you view MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News, you might get some middle ground to work with. About six months ago, I started thinking— “where did the money come from for Obama”. I have four daughters who went to College, and we were middle class, and money was tight. We (including my girls) worked hard and there were lots of student loans.
I started looking into Obama’s life.
Around 1979 Obama started college at Occidental in California. He is very open about his two years at Occidental; he tried all kinds of drugs and was wasting his time but, even though he had a brilliant mind, did not apply himself to his studies.
“Barry” (that was the name he used all his life) during this time had two roommates, Muhammad Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, both from Pakistan.
During the summer of 1981, after his second year in college, he made a “round the world” trip. Stopping to see his mother in Indonesia, next Hyderabad in India, three weeks in Karachi, Pakistan where he stayed with his roommate’s family, then off to Africa to visit his father’s family.
My question – Where did he get the money for this trip? Nether I, nor any one of my children would have had money for a trip like this when they where in college. When he came back he started school at Columbia University in New York. It is at this time he wants everyone to call him Barack – not Barry.
Do you know what the tuition is at Columbia? It’s not cheap! to say the least. Where did he get money for tuition? Student Loans? Maybe. After Columbia, he went to Chicago to work as a Community Organizer for $12,000. a year. Why Chicago? Why not New York? He was already living in New York.
By “chance” he met Antoin “Tony” Rezko, born in Aleppo Syria, and a real estate developer in Chicago. Rezko has been convicted of fraud and bribery this year. Rezko, was named “Entrepreneur of the Decade” by the Arab-American Business and Professional Association”.
About two years later, Obama entered Harvard Law School. Do you have any idea what tuition is for Harvard Law School? Where did he get the money for Law School? More student loans? After Law school, he went back to Chicago. Rezko offered him a job, which he turned down. But, he did take a job with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland. Guess what? They represented “Rezar” which is Rezko’s firm. Rezko was one of Obama’s first major financial contributors when he ran for office in Chicago. In 2003, Rezko threw an early fundraiser for Obama which Chicago Tribune reporter David Mendelland claims was instrumental in providing Obama with “seed money” for his U.S. Senate race.
In 2005, Obama purchased a new home in Kenwood District of Chicago for $1.65 million (less than asking price). With ALL those Student Loans – Where did he get the money for the property? On the same day Rezko’s wife, Rita, purchased the adjoining empty lot for full price. The London Times reported that Nadhmi Auchi, an Iraqi-born Billionaire loaned Rezko $3.5 million three weeks before Obama’s new home was purchased. Obama met Nadhmi Auchi many times with Rezko.
Now, we have Obama running for President. Valerie Jarrett, was Michele Obama’s boss. She is now Obama’s chief advisor and he does not make any major decisions without talking to her first. Where was Jarrett born? Ready for this? Shiraz, Iran. Do we see a pattern here? Or, am I going crazy?
On May 10, 2008 The Times reported, Robert Malley advisor to Obama was “sacked” after the press found out he was having regular contacts with “Hamas “, which controls Gaza and is connected with Iran. This past week, buried in the back part of the papers, Iraqi newspapers reported that during Obama’s visit to Iraq, he asked their leaders to do nothing about the war until after he is elected, and he will “Take care of things”.
Oh, and by the way, remember the college roommates that where born in Pakistan? They are in charge of all those “small” Internet campaign contributions for Obama. Where is that money coming from? The poor and middle class in this country? Or could it be from the Middle East?
And the final bit of news. On September 7, 2008, The Washington Times posted a verbal slip that was made on “This Week” with George Stephanapoulos. Obama on talking about his religion said, “My Muslim faith”. When questioned, “he made a mistake”. Some mistake!
All of the above information I got on line. If you would like to check it – Wikipedia, encyclopedia, Barack Obama; Tony Rezko; Valerie Jarrett: Daily Times – Obama visited Pakistan in 1981; The Washington Times – September 7, 2008; The Times May 10, 2008.
Now the BIG question – If I found out all this information on my own, why haven’t all of our “intelligent” members of the press been reporting this?
A phrase that keeps ringing in my ear – “Beware of the enemy from within.”
Disclaimer
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com Email
Article Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files,
Highest Quality Live Programs
SEE ALSO:
THE FIRST TIME I HEARD OF BARACK….
http://tinyurl.com/5fwnoo
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
**********
Contact Info: GunnyG@gmail.com
('Fair Use' Excerpts Back-Linked To Source)
*****
2008/2012
GyG: RON PAUL: 2008/2012 (The ONLY Choice)
CLICK FLAG!
GO TO THE "OTHER" GUNNY G BLOG! (CLICK FLAG)
ANOTHER GUNNY G BLOG!
ANOTHER GyG BLOG ~ CLICK FLAG!
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Revealed: Obama's CT Social Security # Traced To John Paul Ludwig (Lived CT-Died HI)
Revealed: Obama's CT Social Security # Traced To John Paul Ludwig (Lived CT-Died HI)
Political Forum ^ | 3/14/2011 | Apuzzo
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 3:34:43 PM by bkopto
This news is breaking: This is bad news for Obama.
This is what we know so far. We get more info on Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890, had CT SSN obtained in 1976 and died in HI around 1981. There are 2 SS numbers for him and records show him dying in 2 different states: CA and HI around 1981.
The reason this is important, is because there is a similar fact pattern to Obama. Barack Obama is residing today in the White House, using CT SS number 042-68-4425, issued in CT in and around March 1977 to an elderly individual named John Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890, who is presumed dead and whose death was either never reported to the SS administration or reported and deleted from the database by someone.
Obama's maternal grandmother Madelyn Dunham, worked as a part-timer or volunteer in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse. Thus she would have access to the estate files of anyone who died there.
Thus if the elderly man originally from CT died intestate in Hawaii with no known relatives, Grandma Dunham would have known this person is a prime candidate to steal the SSN of since there would be no known surviving family worrying about the death benefit from SSN and that the benefit was not likely applied for and thus SSA did not know he died.
Thus the SSN remained active for the deceased person and Obama could "adopt" it as his own. This is a clear case of identity theft at the federal level.
This is what we know about Ludwig:
In 1924, Jean Paul Ludwig worked for Senator Reed of PA, in Washington DC.
On the ship manifest of ‘Leviathan’, he listed Senator Reed in Washington...
Political Forum ^ | 3/14/2011 | Apuzzo
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 3:34:43 PM by bkopto
This news is breaking: This is bad news for Obama.
This is what we know so far. We get more info on Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890, had CT SSN obtained in 1976 and died in HI around 1981. There are 2 SS numbers for him and records show him dying in 2 different states: CA and HI around 1981.
The reason this is important, is because there is a similar fact pattern to Obama. Barack Obama is residing today in the White House, using CT SS number 042-68-4425, issued in CT in and around March 1977 to an elderly individual named John Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890, who is presumed dead and whose death was either never reported to the SS administration or reported and deleted from the database by someone.
Obama's maternal grandmother Madelyn Dunham, worked as a part-timer or volunteer in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse. Thus she would have access to the estate files of anyone who died there.
Thus if the elderly man originally from CT died intestate in Hawaii with no known relatives, Grandma Dunham would have known this person is a prime candidate to steal the SSN of since there would be no known surviving family worrying about the death benefit from SSN and that the benefit was not likely applied for and thus SSA did not know he died.
Thus the SSN remained active for the deceased person and Obama could "adopt" it as his own. This is a clear case of identity theft at the federal level.
This is what we know about Ludwig:
In 1924, Jean Paul Ludwig worked for Senator Reed of PA, in Washington DC.
On the ship manifest of ‘Leviathan’, he listed Senator Reed in Washington...
(Excerpt) Read more at politicalforum.com ...
Social mobility drive to track us to age of 30
Social mobility drive to track us to age of 30
Daily Mail ^ | 31st March 2011 | Daily Mail Reporter
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 2:17:30 PM by bronxville
Everyone will have their educational and work achievements tracked from birth to the age of 30 under radical plans to improve social mobility.
Ministers will unveil seven new ‘Life Chance Indicators’ next week as part of a plan to help children from poorer homes do better.
The indicators measure everything from a person’s weight at birth to their university achievements and earnings at the age of 30.
Five-year-olds will be tested for their ‘readiness for school’, including their academic ability and ability to listen.
The measures will be used to judge whether initiatives such as the Sure Start programme to help children from poorer homes are effective or should be scrapped.
In most cases the indicators will draw on existing data, although some new figures will have to be collected. Ministers will pledge to publish an annual report charting progress – or the lack of it – on each of the measures, and to take action where improvement is slow.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1371742/Social-mobility-drive-track-education-work-achievement-age-30.html#ixzz1J8xAficz
Daily Mail ^ | 31st March 2011 | Daily Mail Reporter
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 2:17:30 PM by bronxville
Everyone will have their educational and work achievements tracked from birth to the age of 30 under radical plans to improve social mobility.
Ministers will unveil seven new ‘Life Chance Indicators’ next week as part of a plan to help children from poorer homes do better.
The indicators measure everything from a person’s weight at birth to their university achievements and earnings at the age of 30.
Five-year-olds will be tested for their ‘readiness for school’, including their academic ability and ability to listen.
The measures will be used to judge whether initiatives such as the Sure Start programme to help children from poorer homes are effective or should be scrapped.
In most cases the indicators will draw on existing data, although some new figures will have to be collected. Ministers will pledge to publish an annual report charting progress – or the lack of it – on each of the measures, and to take action where improvement is slow.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1371742/Social-mobility-drive-track-education-work-achievement-age-30.html#ixzz1J8xAficz
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Trump As President
Trump As President
Flopping Aces ^ | 04-10-11 | James Raider
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 2:02:20 PM by Starman417
Donald Trump has teased the electorate in the past, pretending to seriously consider a run for the White House. This Presidential election finds Republican support for some politically green but very appealing potential candidates. These may well bide their time and wait until 2016 before displaying the audacity to become pretenders to the seat in the Oval Office. Past analysis such as Obama – The First Tell, was helpful in anticipating a President Elect’s road ahead. Trump’s superficial relationship with the voting public has been distorted by its inevitable distance from an unusual celebrity billionaire. Donald Trump has delighted in each moment of attention he has been able to attract by jumping onto the spotlight dot. His reach into our communal consciousness begs a little scrutiny.
• Trump is not ideologically anchored. This moves his appeal factor positively as he will carry little obligation to either political party. He will also present a more refreshing alternative to a public tired of Washington indebtedness to special interests. At the very least, he will be more honest with how he feels, and he will easily be more knowledgeable with on all topics than what we have seen subjected to since the last Presidential election.
• A lack of ideological fervor also makes it more likely that from his perch in the Oval Office he would be a pragmatist. Unlike the embarrassingly far “left” rooted individuals choking the Obama Administration, Trump would most probably pluck the best talent, however it might present itself, wherever he could find it, and in whatever political flavor it might be drenched.
• His insecurities mean his ego can be stroked to get his favor and attention, but he isn't narcissistic. In Trump’s case the insecurities also suggest that he is driven to succeed.
• Trump will surround himself with experienced talent, and it is unlikely that he will punt important decisions down the road, or to someone else, unlike Obama who is clearly controlled by his handlers and seems ready, willing and able, to have others take care of business. If and when America elects Trump, he will be the President, NOT one of his handlers.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
Flopping Aces ^ | 04-10-11 | James Raider
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 2:02:20 PM by Starman417
Donald Trump has teased the electorate in the past, pretending to seriously consider a run for the White House. This Presidential election finds Republican support for some politically green but very appealing potential candidates. These may well bide their time and wait until 2016 before displaying the audacity to become pretenders to the seat in the Oval Office. Past analysis such as Obama – The First Tell, was helpful in anticipating a President Elect’s road ahead. Trump’s superficial relationship with the voting public has been distorted by its inevitable distance from an unusual celebrity billionaire. Donald Trump has delighted in each moment of attention he has been able to attract by jumping onto the spotlight dot. His reach into our communal consciousness begs a little scrutiny.
• Trump is not ideologically anchored. This moves his appeal factor positively as he will carry little obligation to either political party. He will also present a more refreshing alternative to a public tired of Washington indebtedness to special interests. At the very least, he will be more honest with how he feels, and he will easily be more knowledgeable with on all topics than what we have seen subjected to since the last Presidential election.
• A lack of ideological fervor also makes it more likely that from his perch in the Oval Office he would be a pragmatist. Unlike the embarrassingly far “left” rooted individuals choking the Obama Administration, Trump would most probably pluck the best talent, however it might present itself, wherever he could find it, and in whatever political flavor it might be drenched.
• His insecurities mean his ego can be stroked to get his favor and attention, but he isn't narcissistic. In Trump’s case the insecurities also suggest that he is driven to succeed.
• Trump will surround himself with experienced talent, and it is unlikely that he will punt important decisions down the road, or to someone else, unlike Obama who is clearly controlled by his handlers and seems ready, willing and able, to have others take care of business. If and when America elects Trump, he will be the President, NOT one of his handlers.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
The Importance of Supporting Trump
The Importance of Supporting Trump
By Jim O'Neill Full Story
By Jim O'Neill Full Story
“...if it were not an issue, why wouldn’t he just solve it? I wish he would, because if he doesn’t, it’s one of the greatest scams in the history of politics and…history, period.” Donald Trump regarding Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS
Boehner’s Boner ~ I fear we have yet again been duped by the Democrats and the GOP party establishment
Boehner’s Boner
By Timothy Birdnow Full Story
By Timothy Birdnow Full Story
Many conservative pundits - most notably Andrew Stiles at National Review Online - are touting the budget deal as a great victory for the GOP. Sorry, but I beg to differ. I fear we have yet again been duped by the Democrats and the GOP party establishment. Let me take the Stiles piece and deconstruct it line by line.
An Open Letter to Herman Cain »
An Open Letter to Herman Cain »
IS HE A SUPPORTER OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION OR JUST ANOTHER POLITICIAN? by Neil Turner Herman Cain was born in 1945 and was the chairman and CEO of Godfather’s Pizza. He is also a radio...April 10 2011 / No comment / Read More »
For Those Wishing to Send Information to Donald Trump » ~ PLEASE SEND IT BY CERTIFIED MAIL by Sharon Rondeau
PLEASE SEND IT BY CERTIFIED MAIL
by Sharon Rondeau
The atrium of the Trump Tower in New York City spans five floors, a bridge which transcends a pool, a waterfall, skylight and many specialty shops.
(Apr. 9, 2011) — Many of our readers are asking how to send information to Donald Trump’s team to answer his request for more information regarding the “natural born Citizen” issue raised during yesterday’s meeting in New York City.
The Post & Email has spoken to Jeff, one of the attendees at the meeting, who said that he believes he has “more than enough” information to enlighten Mr. Trump and his team on the subject.
However, there has been an overwhelming response to Jeff’s “homework” assignment, and those who have performed extensive research on the origins and meaning of “natural born Citizen” should be encouraged to share their work with the Trump team.
The Camelot Cover-up Continues
The Camelot Cover-up Continues
Townhall.com ^ | April 10, 2011 | David Stokes
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 12:28:58 PM by Kaslin
Gene Healy, author of The Cult of the Presidency—America’s Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power, suggests: “In an age when Americans periodically swoon for imperial presidents, a little sacred cow-tipping would be a public service.” The made-for-television mini-series, The Kennedys, recently airing on ReelzChannel is a case in point.
Unceremoniously cancelled earlier this year by The History Channel as not a good “fit” for “the History brand,” the project was controversial almost from its inception. This had to do completely with the hypersensitivity of a vast array of myth-guardians who stand perpetual watch over the Kennedy family, as well as the career and legacy of America’s 35th President. And these members of the Camelot cabal pretty much wrote the book on branding.
I have long been a student of the Kennedy era and I wrote a Master’s thesis on it many years ago while working on my political science degree. And frankly, I have yet to see a scenario or fact presented in the broadcast that has not appeared in the history available at any public library or bookstore. I find myself wondering why the fuss?
The John F. Kennedy portrayed in this new series is a real life character—warts and all. Greg Kinnear does an admirable job with the JFK persona, as does Katie Holmes with Jackie Kennedy. Is it all flattering? Certainly not. But JFK comes off as a much more sympathetic character in this current portrayal than might have been expected after hearing all the advance hype and horror. In fact, in my opinion the production spends a tortured amount of time showing him as a man much more “conflicted” about the flaws, now well known, than he really was.
I can’t for the life of me see why The History Channel blackballed the miniseries, when they regularly show things like Monster Quest, Swamp People, and Clash of the Cavemen. You know, real serious history stuff. Not to mention the fact, that the network regularly peddles speculative conspiracy theories, from novelist Brad Meltzer’s Decoded, to several programs dealing with various theories on—ironically—the Kennedy assassination.
Of course, there was a very real conspiracy behind The History Channel’s decision to dump the miniseries. It doesn’t take Glenn Beck’s blackboard to connect those dots. But after watching The Kennedys, I am completely at a loss to figure out why anyone seriously found the material objectionable. The broadcast broke no new ground.
Likely, the keepers of the fictional Camelot flame simply didn’t want another reminder of the vast disconnect between calculated and conjured myth in the wake of Mr. Kennedy’s tragic death and actual reality. Whether one reads a good book about the Kennedy years or watches The Kennedys on ReelzChannel, one thing is clear—there were potential ethical and moral time bombs threatening his presidency. And there is a credible case to be made that had Kennedy lived beyond that fateful fall day in 1963, and had he managed to be reelected in 1964 (not at all a sure thing), he may not have survived a second term, politically.
That’s right. As Hugh Sidey suggested before his death in 2005—the same Hugh Sidey, who as an editor at Time Magazine during the Kennedy years, was also a Camelot insider—JFK’s various and sundry moral, ethical, and judgmental, pecadillos might very well have led to his actual impeachment.
The Kennedy administration could very well have been on the road to its own kind of Watergate.
From the improper use of the FBI in surveillance and investigation in matters not at all related to national security, to misuse of the Secret Service, to his affair with a mistress of a major crime boss, with its obvious compromises, Mr. Kennedy played by his own rules against the backdrop of the last gasp of an age of media mercy. He lived on the edge, from his monumental sexual addiction, to his experimentation with illicit drugs, to his dependence on substances that, while not illegal, were questionable—John F. Kennedy’s time was running out. People were always covering for him and clearly many still are.
But was it only a matter of time before someone broke rank?
If Watergate taught us anything, it was that it is hard to keep a lid on a big story—even in the White House. Had John F. Kennedy lived and had his shortcomings been investigated and written with Woodward-Bernstein-like passion, it is not far-fetched that he may not have been reelected in 1964. And if he did manage to win that race, and investigators did their jobs, JFK might very well have been impeached or pressured to resign.
Then again, that may be fantasy, because it was unlikely that Ben Bradlee, editor of the Washington Post in those days, and an inbred Kennedy crony, would have allowed any such story to go forward. At any rate, it all went away that sad November day and we are left with a legend that does history, not to mention the American people, a disservice.
And because what could have been a major broadcasting event has been dispatched to cable television’s backwater, it seems that the cover-up continues.
That “brief and shining moment” that never really was, lives on.
Townhall.com ^ | April 10, 2011 | David Stokes
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 12:28:58 PM by Kaslin
Gene Healy, author of The Cult of the Presidency—America’s Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power, suggests: “In an age when Americans periodically swoon for imperial presidents, a little sacred cow-tipping would be a public service.” The made-for-television mini-series, The Kennedys, recently airing on ReelzChannel is a case in point.
Unceremoniously cancelled earlier this year by The History Channel as not a good “fit” for “the History brand,” the project was controversial almost from its inception. This had to do completely with the hypersensitivity of a vast array of myth-guardians who stand perpetual watch over the Kennedy family, as well as the career and legacy of America’s 35th President. And these members of the Camelot cabal pretty much wrote the book on branding.
I have long been a student of the Kennedy era and I wrote a Master’s thesis on it many years ago while working on my political science degree. And frankly, I have yet to see a scenario or fact presented in the broadcast that has not appeared in the history available at any public library or bookstore. I find myself wondering why the fuss?
The John F. Kennedy portrayed in this new series is a real life character—warts and all. Greg Kinnear does an admirable job with the JFK persona, as does Katie Holmes with Jackie Kennedy. Is it all flattering? Certainly not. But JFK comes off as a much more sympathetic character in this current portrayal than might have been expected after hearing all the advance hype and horror. In fact, in my opinion the production spends a tortured amount of time showing him as a man much more “conflicted” about the flaws, now well known, than he really was.
I can’t for the life of me see why The History Channel blackballed the miniseries, when they regularly show things like Monster Quest, Swamp People, and Clash of the Cavemen. You know, real serious history stuff. Not to mention the fact, that the network regularly peddles speculative conspiracy theories, from novelist Brad Meltzer’s Decoded, to several programs dealing with various theories on—ironically—the Kennedy assassination.
Of course, there was a very real conspiracy behind The History Channel’s decision to dump the miniseries. It doesn’t take Glenn Beck’s blackboard to connect those dots. But after watching The Kennedys, I am completely at a loss to figure out why anyone seriously found the material objectionable. The broadcast broke no new ground.
Likely, the keepers of the fictional Camelot flame simply didn’t want another reminder of the vast disconnect between calculated and conjured myth in the wake of Mr. Kennedy’s tragic death and actual reality. Whether one reads a good book about the Kennedy years or watches The Kennedys on ReelzChannel, one thing is clear—there were potential ethical and moral time bombs threatening his presidency. And there is a credible case to be made that had Kennedy lived beyond that fateful fall day in 1963, and had he managed to be reelected in 1964 (not at all a sure thing), he may not have survived a second term, politically.
That’s right. As Hugh Sidey suggested before his death in 2005—the same Hugh Sidey, who as an editor at Time Magazine during the Kennedy years, was also a Camelot insider—JFK’s various and sundry moral, ethical, and judgmental, pecadillos might very well have led to his actual impeachment.
The Kennedy administration could very well have been on the road to its own kind of Watergate.
From the improper use of the FBI in surveillance and investigation in matters not at all related to national security, to misuse of the Secret Service, to his affair with a mistress of a major crime boss, with its obvious compromises, Mr. Kennedy played by his own rules against the backdrop of the last gasp of an age of media mercy. He lived on the edge, from his monumental sexual addiction, to his experimentation with illicit drugs, to his dependence on substances that, while not illegal, were questionable—John F. Kennedy’s time was running out. People were always covering for him and clearly many still are.
But was it only a matter of time before someone broke rank?
If Watergate taught us anything, it was that it is hard to keep a lid on a big story—even in the White House. Had John F. Kennedy lived and had his shortcomings been investigated and written with Woodward-Bernstein-like passion, it is not far-fetched that he may not have been reelected in 1964. And if he did manage to win that race, and investigators did their jobs, JFK might very well have been impeached or pressured to resign.
Then again, that may be fantasy, because it was unlikely that Ben Bradlee, editor of the Washington Post in those days, and an inbred Kennedy crony, would have allowed any such story to go forward. At any rate, it all went away that sad November day and we are left with a legend that does history, not to mention the American people, a disservice.
And because what could have been a major broadcasting event has been dispatched to cable television’s backwater, it seems that the cover-up continues.
That “brief and shining moment” that never really was, lives on.
The Prosecution Rests, but I Can’t
The Prosecution Rests, but I Can’t
New York Times ^ | April 9th, 2011 | John Thompson
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 12:24:30 PM by KantianBurke
I SPENT 18 years in prison for robbery and murder, 14 of them on death row.
I’ve been free since 2003, exonerated after evidence covered up by prosecutors surfaced just weeks before my execution date.
Those prosecutors were never punished. Last month, the Supreme Court decided 5-4 to overturn a case I’d won against them and the district attorney who oversaw my case, ruling that they were not liable for the failure to turn over that evidence — which included proof that blood at the robbery scene wasn’t mine.
Because of that, prosecutors are free to do the same thing to someone else today.
New York Times ^ | April 9th, 2011 | John Thompson
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 12:24:30 PM by KantianBurke
I SPENT 18 years in prison for robbery and murder, 14 of them on death row.
I’ve been free since 2003, exonerated after evidence covered up by prosecutors surfaced just weeks before my execution date.
Those prosecutors were never punished. Last month, the Supreme Court decided 5-4 to overturn a case I’d won against them and the district attorney who oversaw my case, ruling that they were not liable for the failure to turn over that evidence — which included proof that blood at the robbery scene wasn’t mine.
Because of that, prosecutors are free to do the same thing to someone else today.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Obama Adviser Calls Trump Birther Comments a 'Sideshow'
Obama Adviser Calls Trump Birther Comments a 'Sideshow'
Fox News ^ | 04/10/2011
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 11:42:32 AM by Smokeyblue
A top White House adviser on Sunday decried Donald Trump's recent public appearances as a "sideshow," saying the American people will not be swayed by the questions he's raised about President Obama's citizenship.
Polls show that the billionaire reality star's popularity has been on the rise as he's taken up the so-called "birther" cause. He's expected to decide by June whether he's in or out as a presidential candidate, and White House senior adviser David Plouffe suggested the White House is not at all nervous.
"I hope he keeps on rising (in the polls) because ... there's zero chance that Donald Trump would ever be hired by the American people to do this job," he said on ABC's "This Week." "There may be a small part of the country that believes these things, but mainstream Americans think it's a sideshow."
Fox News ^ | 04/10/2011
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 11:42:32 AM by Smokeyblue
A top White House adviser on Sunday decried Donald Trump's recent public appearances as a "sideshow," saying the American people will not be swayed by the questions he's raised about President Obama's citizenship.
Polls show that the billionaire reality star's popularity has been on the rise as he's taken up the so-called "birther" cause. He's expected to decide by June whether he's in or out as a presidential candidate, and White House senior adviser David Plouffe suggested the White House is not at all nervous.
"I hope he keeps on rising (in the polls) because ... there's zero chance that Donald Trump would ever be hired by the American people to do this job," he said on ABC's "This Week." "There may be a small part of the country that believes these things, but mainstream Americans think it's a sideshow."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Blind Leftist Devotion to Obama Results From Marxist Critical Theory
Blind Leftist Devotion to Obama Results From Marxist Critical Theory
Canada Free Press ^ | April 10, 2011 | Kelly O'Connell
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:57:19 AM by Scanian
Recall, Obama was declared a genius of geniuses by the elites when he ran for president, based on admittance to Harvard Law and a few stirring speeches. Yet, once upon a time, some effort was made to connect education to that holy grail called “intelligence.” After all, wasn’t that the entire argument behind the support and development of the “Ivy League”? But as the average—meaning intellectually guileless—person now sees daily and proved by incontrovertible evidence, being an elite simply means you have been trained into sneering, illiterate idiocy.
There is no longer any credible evidence suggesting elites and liberals understand, let alone are committed to, the good life all normal Americans desire. And after rejecting a second Obama presidency—the way a stomach turns on Tijuana water—we must utterly rethink our cultural goals and strategies for their achievement. The first step for this is to defang the serpent by de-funding the Ivy League, or at least cleaning the decks of its illiterate Marxist masters.
I. Liberal Elitist & Intellectual’s Massive Support for Obama Everyone knows liberal intellectuals went haywire for Barack Obama when he first ran for president. Consider the following quotes to recall how he was being touted as a mix of Aristotle, Lincoln, Gandhi, Alexander the Great, Christ and FDR:
Canada Free Press ^ | April 10, 2011 | Kelly O'Connell
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:57:19 AM by Scanian
Recall, Obama was declared a genius of geniuses by the elites when he ran for president, based on admittance to Harvard Law and a few stirring speeches. Yet, once upon a time, some effort was made to connect education to that holy grail called “intelligence.” After all, wasn’t that the entire argument behind the support and development of the “Ivy League”? But as the average—meaning intellectually guileless—person now sees daily and proved by incontrovertible evidence, being an elite simply means you have been trained into sneering, illiterate idiocy.
There is no longer any credible evidence suggesting elites and liberals understand, let alone are committed to, the good life all normal Americans desire. And after rejecting a second Obama presidency—the way a stomach turns on Tijuana water—we must utterly rethink our cultural goals and strategies for their achievement. The first step for this is to defang the serpent by de-funding the Ivy League, or at least cleaning the decks of its illiterate Marxist masters.
I. Liberal Elitist & Intellectual’s Massive Support for Obama Everyone knows liberal intellectuals went haywire for Barack Obama when he first ran for president. Consider the following quotes to recall how he was being touted as a mix of Aristotle, Lincoln, Gandhi, Alexander the Great, Christ and FDR:
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
His name is “Steve Dunham”!
His name is “Steve Dunham”!
ThePostemail.com ^ | April 10, 2011 | John Charlton
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:50:07 AM by Scanian
An intrepid citizen-researcher has confirmed that the man who goes by the name “Barack Hussein Obama II,” has an original vital record kept by the Hawaii Department of Health, which bears the name “Steve Dunham.” The citizen researcher began her quest, following two lines of research: 1) the fact that the name “Steve Dunham” appears in records associated with Obama’s alleged mother, Stanley Ann Dunham; and 2) the fact that Obama himself is said to have quipped that his middle name was “Steve” (as some of his followers know cf. YYouhan’s comment). The Quip The quip is recorded to have taken place during the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner, on Oct. 16, 2008, and was reported by Real Clear Politics in the 4th video segment at their site, at the 1:37 mark..
The video at YouTube can be viewed through this link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkBQf4FJi-o&feature=player_embedded, or at 1:31 in another version of the video, at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SkFjTCscM4 . Here is the second version, look for it at 1:30 ff.. [video]
ThePostemail.com ^ | April 10, 2011 | John Charlton
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:50:07 AM by Scanian
An intrepid citizen-researcher has confirmed that the man who goes by the name “Barack Hussein Obama II,” has an original vital record kept by the Hawaii Department of Health, which bears the name “Steve Dunham.” The citizen researcher began her quest, following two lines of research: 1) the fact that the name “Steve Dunham” appears in records associated with Obama’s alleged mother, Stanley Ann Dunham; and 2) the fact that Obama himself is said to have quipped that his middle name was “Steve” (as some of his followers know cf. YYouhan’s comment). The Quip The quip is recorded to have taken place during the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner, on Oct. 16, 2008, and was reported by Real Clear Politics in the 4th video segment at their site, at the 1:37 mark..
The video at YouTube can be viewed through this link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkBQf4FJi-o&feature=player_embedded, or at 1:31 in another version of the video, at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SkFjTCscM4 . Here is the second version, look for it at 1:30 ff.. [video]
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Palin on Trump the Birther: You Go, Donald
Palin on Trump the Birther: You Go, Donald
Newser.com ^ | 4/10/2011 | Polly Davis Doig
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:40:15 AM by SonOfDarkSkies
Sarah Palin thinks Barack Obama was born in Hawaii and all, but says of Donald Trump's sudden quest for the president's birth certificate, "More power to him." Asked her opinion yesterday by Fox News, Palin replied, "Well, I appreciate that the Donald wants to spend his resources in getting to the bottom of something that so interests him and many Americans. You know, more power to him."
Mediaite has the clip.
"Obviously there's something there that the president doesn't want people to see on that birth certificate," she said, calling that "perplexing to a lot of people.
Newser.com ^ | 4/10/2011 | Polly Davis Doig
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:40:15 AM by SonOfDarkSkies
Sarah Palin thinks Barack Obama was born in Hawaii and all, but says of Donald Trump's sudden quest for the president's birth certificate, "More power to him." Asked her opinion yesterday by Fox News, Palin replied, "Well, I appreciate that the Donald wants to spend his resources in getting to the bottom of something that so interests him and many Americans. You know, more power to him."
Mediaite has the clip.
"Obviously there's something there that the president doesn't want people to see on that birth certificate," she said, calling that "perplexing to a lot of people.
Obama’s dozens of Social Security Numbers
Obama’s dozens of Social Security Numbers
coachisright.com ^ | April 10, 2011 | Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:31:09 AM by jmaroneps37
Discrepancies in Barack Obama’s history “that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President” have been accepted “quietly” for study by the U.S, Supreme Court, according to an Email this web site received just this week.
The memo which goes on to refer to “possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii,” is quite similar to an investigation coachisright.com posted on May 16, 2010.
According to a search done by former British police detective Neil Sankey, now a U.S. citizen and a licensed private investigator in Los Angeles, Barack Obama reportedly has 27 different social security numbers under 21 different personal and/or familial name variations in 22 different states plus the District of Columbia.
Along with PI Susan Daniels, Sankey generated a large social security public data base in his lengthy research project, titled “List of Properties associated with Barack Obama and his family.”
Sankey’s research is featured in a web video entitled Dossier2MP4 produced by Jim Przybowski. The Sankey/Daniels social security investigation segment alleges Obama currently is using a Social Security number assigned to someone born in Connecticut in l890!
N.B. There is no indication that the Social Security Administration re-issues numbers upon the death of a number holder no matter how long ago they were originally issued.
Sankey and Daniels report that Social Security numbers connected to Barack Obama and the addresses they trace to are as follows: 363 Notlem St., 34982-7358 Fort Pierce, FL.
A Social Security number beginning with zero is connected to “White House, Irvine, CA.” A number starting with 282 connects to “713 Hart Senate, D.C,” There was one connected to “White House, Baltimore, MD.” Six more Social Security numbers beginning in the 400s…
More...
coachisright.com ^ | April 10, 2011 | Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer
Posted on Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:31:09 AM by jmaroneps37
Discrepancies in Barack Obama’s history “that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President” have been accepted “quietly” for study by the U.S, Supreme Court, according to an Email this web site received just this week.
The memo which goes on to refer to “possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii,” is quite similar to an investigation coachisright.com posted on May 16, 2010.
According to a search done by former British police detective Neil Sankey, now a U.S. citizen and a licensed private investigator in Los Angeles, Barack Obama reportedly has 27 different social security numbers under 21 different personal and/or familial name variations in 22 different states plus the District of Columbia.
Along with PI Susan Daniels, Sankey generated a large social security public data base in his lengthy research project, titled “List of Properties associated with Barack Obama and his family.”
Sankey’s research is featured in a web video entitled Dossier2MP4 produced by Jim Przybowski. The Sankey/Daniels social security investigation segment alleges Obama currently is using a Social Security number assigned to someone born in Connecticut in l890!
N.B. There is no indication that the Social Security Administration re-issues numbers upon the death of a number holder no matter how long ago they were originally issued.
Sankey and Daniels report that Social Security numbers connected to Barack Obama and the addresses they trace to are as follows: 363 Notlem St., 34982-7358 Fort Pierce, FL.
A Social Security number beginning with zero is connected to “White House, Irvine, CA.” A number starting with 282 connects to “713 Hart Senate, D.C,” There was one connected to “White House, Baltimore, MD.” Six more Social Security numbers beginning in the 400s…
More...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Devvy's Email Alerts...
Posted on my web site with links; www.devvy.com
This is a bit late because my web master had some critical deadlines Friday he had to get done for his real job.
There will be new posts Monday late afternoon, so if you can't get to something on this list before then, you might wish to book mark it for later reading.
What Happened to the 'Liberty Dollar'? A dissenting view from Bill Rounds
------------------------------
Justice Hugo Black in DUNCAN v LOUISIANA Indicates Obama Would Not Be Eligible: Ineligibility Echoed by Former Attorney General Jeremiah Black
------------------------------
Here in West Texas we are in drought conditions. Water cut backs are now in effect. Our ranchers and farmers desperately need rain. The people need water as well as all the farm animals. This is a very bad situation if we don't get some good, sustained rain soon.
The criss cross spraying of our beautiful blue skies turning them into gray gunky overcast on some days is relentless giving me a massive migraine headache. My husband's allergies are crippling during spray days, and since he has advanced lung disease, on the days they spray, he cannot go outside.
I sent my newly elected state rep the DVD with G. Edward Griffin on what in the world are they spraying? I doubt he's watched it and tragically, I see nothing happening in our state legislature on this issue. In the meantime our weather is completely off kilter. Oklahoma is justifiably worried things could worsen to Dust Bowl conditions, yet politicians who are breathing the same poison do nothing.
Geoengineering (aerosol spraying) is one of the greatest human and environmental tragedies that has been underway for the past decade and it's no conspiracy theory. The government documents are there for anyone to see for themselves.
Two premiere and ACCURATE sites developed by my friend, Rosalind Peterson:
The Agriculture Defense Coalition
California Sky Watch
------------------------------
This column is factual. It's long but should be read to fully understand how evil all those programs are - especially the ones fooling with the weather to combat the fraud known as global warming.
This is a bit late because my web master had some critical deadlines Friday he had to get done for his real job.
There will be new posts Monday late afternoon, so if you can't get to something on this list before then, you might wish to book mark it for later reading.
What Happened to the 'Liberty Dollar'? A dissenting view from Bill Rounds
------------------------------
Justice Hugo Black in DUNCAN v LOUISIANA Indicates Obama Would Not Be Eligible: Ineligibility Echoed by Former Attorney General Jeremiah Black
------------------------------
Here in West Texas we are in drought conditions. Water cut backs are now in effect. Our ranchers and farmers desperately need rain. The people need water as well as all the farm animals. This is a very bad situation if we don't get some good, sustained rain soon.
The criss cross spraying of our beautiful blue skies turning them into gray gunky overcast on some days is relentless giving me a massive migraine headache. My husband's allergies are crippling during spray days, and since he has advanced lung disease, on the days they spray, he cannot go outside.
I sent my newly elected state rep the DVD with G. Edward Griffin on what in the world are they spraying? I doubt he's watched it and tragically, I see nothing happening in our state legislature on this issue. In the meantime our weather is completely off kilter. Oklahoma is justifiably worried things could worsen to Dust Bowl conditions, yet politicians who are breathing the same poison do nothing.
Geoengineering (aerosol spraying) is one of the greatest human and environmental tragedies that has been underway for the past decade and it's no conspiracy theory. The government documents are there for anyone to see for themselves.
Two premiere and ACCURATE sites developed by my friend, Rosalind Peterson:
The Agriculture Defense Coalition
California Sky Watch
------------------------------
This column is factual. It's long but should be read to fully understand how evil all those programs are - especially the ones fooling with the weather to combat the fraud known as global warming.
The Secret Cabal...
Similar things have taken place in the U.S.
• The Congressional investigation of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor concealed the truth.
• The Warren Commission concealed the truth.
• The 9/11 Commission concealed the truth.
• The Warren Commission concealed the truth.
• The 9/11 Commission concealed the truth.
Professor Quigley continued:
BUT CAN CONGRESS LEGISLATE A CONSTITUTIONAL CLAUSE?
BUT CAN CONGRESS LEGISLATE A CONSTITUTIONAL CLAUSE?
by Glen Gilliland
What was the Founders' meaning of the term "natural born Citizen"?
(Apr. 10, 2011) — When I was a young boy in Mr. Hanson’s fifth grade civics class in the mid-60s, we learned that the definition of “natural born Citizen” was exclusively a person born on US soil of parents who are US citizens.
That has been the accepted definition of “natural born Citizen” for most of our history, except between the years 1790-1795, and 1971 to the present.
The first Congress passed the Naturalization Act of 1790:
And the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States…
Not 2 Be Missed | Presidential dream: long walk in the park (Playing golf is a curse!!!))
Truth is, there’s only one thing stopping him from strolling down Penna Ave; the Constitution hasn’t been changed in this regard since the days of Harry Truman, etc.
I have known several Marines who told of meeting Harry taking his morning constitutional—though not alone—on Penna Ave in the old days.
Old Marines Saying:
Ya Can Shock Da Sh!t Troops...
But Ya Cannot Sh!t da Shock troops!
*****
I have known several Marines who told of meeting Harry taking his morning constitutional—though not alone—on Penna Ave in the old days.
Old Marines Saying:
Ya Can Shock Da Sh!t Troops...
But Ya Cannot Sh!t da Shock troops!
*****
Jesse Ventura on Government Cover-Ups . . . 9/11, the Reality of HAARP and Making Government Better
Sunday, April 10, 2011 – with Anthony Wile
Jesse Ventura The Daily Bell is pleased to present an exclusive interview with Jesse Ventura (left).
Introduction: Jesse Ventura is the former Independent Governor of Minnesota. He is also a former U.S. Navy SEAL, professional wrestler, movie actor, a visiting fellow at Harvard Kennedy School of Government, and the New York Times bestselling author of five books. He is currently the host and executive producer of TruTV's Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura. He has a reputation as the ultimate non-partisan truth-seeker; he has no qualms about questioning authority.
A brief synopsis:
Daily Bell: Does the government have too much money? Should the Federal Reserve, which prints money from nothing, be abolished?
Jesse Ventura: Hey wait a minute, the government has no money. It's all the Federal Reserve's money. None of that money belongs to the government. It all comes from the Federal Reserve and their name is on it. We have to get that straight right away. Absolutely the Federal Reserve should be abolished, in my opinion. It was created illegally to begin with, because the Constitution said they couldn't do that and then in 1913 they just amended the Constitution and did it anyway. If you want to amend the Constitution, you have to have approval of two thirds of the states, on a vote. They never did that so the Federal Reserve is illegal.
Daily Bell: Is there such a thing as money power? What it is?
Jesse Ventura: Absolutely, he who has the money has the power. That's why I will tell you that the Federal Reserve probably runs the United States of America because they have the money and the power. The money equates to power.
Daily Bell: Does an Anglo-American monetary elite – a few powerful banking families – want to create a New World Order?
Read More Jesse Ventura: Hey wait a minute, the government has no money. It's all the Federal Reserve's money. None of that money belongs to the government. It all comes from the Federal Reserve and their name is on it. We have to get that straight right away. Absolutely the Federal Reserve should be abolished, in my opinion. It was created illegally to begin with, because the Constitution said they couldn't do that and then in 1913 they just amended the Constitution and did it anyway. If you want to amend the Constitution, you have to have approval of two thirds of the states, on a vote. They never did that so the Federal Reserve is illegal.
Daily Bell: Is there such a thing as money power? What it is?
Jesse Ventura: Absolutely, he who has the money has the power. That's why I will tell you that the Federal Reserve probably runs the United States of America because they have the money and the power. The money equates to power.
Daily Bell: Does an Anglo-American monetary elite – a few powerful banking families – want to create a New World Order?
We look forward to hearing your feedback on today's Daily Bell.
Sincerely,
Anthony Wile
Chief Editor, The Daily Bell
Executive Director, The Foundation for the Advancement of Free-Market Thinking (FAFMT)
Saturday, April 09, 2011
Donald Trump: Oil warrior
Donald Trump: Oil warrior
KIRO-FM ^ | April 9, 2011 | Dave Ross
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 9:21:26 PM by 2ndDivisionVet
Most of the hubbub over Donald Trump have been about his rebirth as a birther.
"Why doesn't he show his birth certificate?" asks Trump.
And Trump has done his best to find it:
"Trump says that he sent investigators to Hawaii to search for the president's birth certificate, and they're coming up empty handed."
But Donald Trump is about a lot more than the Obama birth certificate:
"Unless we get the oil, I have no interest in Libya," says Trump.
Here's a candidate who is willing to go on CNN and say - of COURSE it's about the oil! You don't get involved in a place like Libya to help a bunch of rebels you don't really know:
"We don't know who's being slaughtered," says Trump. "We cannot be the policemen for the world."
Yes we can't be the world's policeman.
He prefers the Genghis Khan model:
"In the old days when you had a war, when you won the war, you won. If they had oil, if they had diamonds, if they had gold - What's going to happen in Iraq is absolutely amazing, two minutes after we leave, Iran is going to take over the great oil fields of Iraq. If I'm president at the time, Iran is not taking over the Iraqi oil fields, we will."
The Trump Doctrine. Don't just occupy Iraq - colonize it.
I bet he'd also be the first president who instead of pardoning the Thanksgiving turkey, would just chop its head of right there on the South Lawn.
KIRO-FM ^ | April 9, 2011 | Dave Ross
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 9:21:26 PM by 2ndDivisionVet
Most of the hubbub over Donald Trump have been about his rebirth as a birther.
"Why doesn't he show his birth certificate?" asks Trump.
And Trump has done his best to find it:
"Trump says that he sent investigators to Hawaii to search for the president's birth certificate, and they're coming up empty handed."
But Donald Trump is about a lot more than the Obama birth certificate:
"Unless we get the oil, I have no interest in Libya," says Trump.
Here's a candidate who is willing to go on CNN and say - of COURSE it's about the oil! You don't get involved in a place like Libya to help a bunch of rebels you don't really know:
"We don't know who's being slaughtered," says Trump. "We cannot be the policemen for the world."
Yes we can't be the world's policeman.
He prefers the Genghis Khan model:
"In the old days when you had a war, when you won the war, you won. If they had oil, if they had diamonds, if they had gold - What's going to happen in Iraq is absolutely amazing, two minutes after we leave, Iran is going to take over the great oil fields of Iraq. If I'm president at the time, Iran is not taking over the Iraqi oil fields, we will."
The Trump Doctrine. Don't just occupy Iraq - colonize it.
I bet he'd also be the first president who instead of pardoning the Thanksgiving turkey, would just chop its head of right there on the South Lawn.
"the Goal is to reach kids before they absorb their parents values," says school administrator!
We've been saying it for a while: The sexuality agenda is now in the elementary schools, and it's worse than you can imagine. (Excerpt) Read more at massresistance.org … via "Goal is to reach kids before they absorb their parents values," says school administrator!. … Read More
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2695831/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2695831/posts
New campaign sets goal of restoration of marriage Ministry leaders say Obama abdicated responsibility by abandoning federal law
New campaign sets goal
of restoration of marriage
Ministry leaders say Obama abdicated
responsibility by abandoning federal law
A new campaign has been launched to restore across America the traditional definition of marriage, and the leaders of several major Christian organizations who are supporting it say they are taking their marching orders from the Old Testament's relatively obscure story of the Tower of Babel.
In Genesis 11, even God was concerned about what the people, who shared a language, could accomplish when they agreed to plans to "build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven," according to the King James Bible.
"And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do; and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do," explains verse six. So God decided to "confound" their speech, so that such a project would not be accomplished.
Kenneth L. Hutcherson, senior pastor and co-founder of Antioch Bible Church in Kirkland, Wash., told WND that while rebellious Old Testament people posed a threat to build a tower to heaven, right now Christian people, working together, have the chance to restore marriage, defined as one man and one woman, to the nation. His comments came in an interview where he said it's not surprising that the secular world would try to redefine marriage to include same-sex duos.
How did this happen in America? Read "Sexual Sabotage" for the explanation of the dark secret's of Alfred Kinsey.
After all, the secular world is just acting like the secular world, he said.
But what bothered him was the lack of a defense by Christians of the definition of a family that predates the U.S. law, the U.S. Constitution and even the Founding Fathers by a few thousand years.
(Story continues below)
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=284809
--
**********
Hey, See the Reader Responses on each article,
they are gems in themselves!
**********
**********
Gunny G: BLOGGER 1984 +
http://gunnyg.blogspot.com
and...
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/
**********
**********
**********
of restoration of marriage
Ministry leaders say Obama abdicatedresponsibility by abandoning federal law
A new campaign has been launched to restore across America the traditional definition of marriage, and the leaders of several major Christian organizations who are supporting it say they are taking their marching orders from the Old Testament's relatively obscure story of the Tower of Babel.
In Genesis 11, even God was concerned about what the people, who shared a language, could accomplish when they agreed to plans to "build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven," according to the King James Bible.
"And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do; and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do," explains verse six. So God decided to "confound" their speech, so that such a project would not be accomplished.
Kenneth L. Hutcherson, senior pastor and co-founder of Antioch Bible Church in Kirkland, Wash., told WND that while rebellious Old Testament people posed a threat to build a tower to heaven, right now Christian people, working together, have the chance to restore marriage, defined as one man and one woman, to the nation. His comments came in an interview where he said it's not surprising that the secular world would try to redefine marriage to include same-sex duos.
How did this happen in America? Read "Sexual Sabotage" for the explanation of the dark secret's of Alfred Kinsey.
After all, the secular world is just acting like the secular world, he said.
But what bothered him was the lack of a defense by Christians of the definition of a family that predates the U.S. law, the U.S. Constitution and even the Founding Fathers by a few thousand years.
(Story continues below)
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=284809
--
**********
Hey, See the Reader Responses on each article,
they are gems in themselves!
**********
**********
Gunny G: BLOGGER 1984 +
http://gunnyg.blogspot.com
and...
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/
**********
**********
**********
Gunny G: Was John Wayne Targeted?
Gunny G: Was John Wayne Targeted?
By Gunny G | January 30, 2009 TARGET: PATTON:
The Plot To Assassinate General George S. Patton, by Robert K. Wilcox
Excerpt: “Into the Night,” pp. 358-360
Just how bizarre and international Stalin’s plots could become is shown in the recent revelation that American icon John Wayne, the actor, was among his intended victims, according to British film historian and Wayne biographer Michael Munn. In the late 1940s, Wayne, a symbol of American independence and ruggedness, spurred by revelations of communist infiltration into the U.S. government, became an ultra-Right anti-communist. He supported Senator Joseph McCarthy in denouncing communists, while most in Hollywood, where Wayne worked, attacked McCarthy and the blacklisting of Hollywood Leftists which McCarthy was spawning. He was elected president of the Motion Picture Alliance for the Preservation of American Ideals and spoke frequently at “Crusade for Freedom” rallies where he denounced such films as All the King’s Men, the 1949 Best Picture winner which he felt “smeared the machinery of the country’s government” and would “tear down people’s faith inthe American way.” (11)
According to sources Munn interviewed (British actor Peter Cushing, movie legend Orson Wells, and American stuntman Yakima Canutt, a personal friend of Wayne’s), Sergi Gerasimov, a Soviet film director, was in Hollywood and became aware of Wayne’s activism. Gerasimov returned to Russia to tell Stalin, who took an active part in Russian film making, about Wayne’s crusade and influence in America. Stalin became convinced that Wayne “was one of the greatest enemies to the Soviet Union,” and a major obstacle to world revolution. (12)
In 1983, writes Munn, Orson Wells, no conservative, told him, “I do not know if the name John Wayne was already known toStalin before 1949, but in 1949 he came to hate it. He feared it. He felt that the name had become a major threat to him and his ideals. In Stalin’s warped mind, the Americans had invented some new secret weapon, more subtle than a nuclear bomb, but just as destructive. Stalin was mad, of course should have been put in a straightjacket. Only a madman like Joseph Stalin would have tried to have John Wayne killed.” (13)
Read the rest of this entry »
The Plot To Assassinate General George S. Patton, by Robert K. Wilcox
Excerpt: “Into the Night,” pp. 358-360
Just how bizarre and international Stalin’s plots could become is shown in the recent revelation that American icon John Wayne, the actor, was among his intended victims, according to British film historian and Wayne biographer Michael Munn. In the late 1940s, Wayne, a symbol of American independence and ruggedness, spurred by revelations of communist infiltration into the U.S. government, became an ultra-Right anti-communist. He supported Senator Joseph McCarthy in denouncing communists, while most in Hollywood, where Wayne worked, attacked McCarthy and the blacklisting of Hollywood Leftists which McCarthy was spawning. He was elected president of the Motion Picture Alliance for the Preservation of American Ideals and spoke frequently at “Crusade for Freedom” rallies where he denounced such films as All the King’s Men, the 1949 Best Picture winner which he felt “smeared the machinery of the country’s government” and would “tear down people’s faith inthe American way.” (11)
According to sources Munn interviewed (British actor Peter Cushing, movie legend Orson Wells, and American stuntman Yakima Canutt, a personal friend of Wayne’s), Sergi Gerasimov, a Soviet film director, was in Hollywood and became aware of Wayne’s activism. Gerasimov returned to Russia to tell Stalin, who took an active part in Russian film making, about Wayne’s crusade and influence in America. Stalin became convinced that Wayne “was one of the greatest enemies to the Soviet Union,” and a major obstacle to world revolution. (12)
In 1983, writes Munn, Orson Wells, no conservative, told him, “I do not know if the name John Wayne was already known toStalin before 1949, but in 1949 he came to hate it. He feared it. He felt that the name had become a major threat to him and his ideals. In Stalin’s warped mind, the Americans had invented some new secret weapon, more subtle than a nuclear bomb, but just as destructive. Stalin was mad, of course should have been put in a straightjacket. Only a madman like Joseph Stalin would have tried to have John Wayne killed.” (13)
Read the rest of this entry »
General Trump – Leading The Charge Against Dishonoring Our Constitution
General Trump – Leading The Charge Against Dishonoring Our Constitution
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 7:02:41 PM by TLittlefella
recognized the indefensible fraud perpetrated against America in the 2008 presidential
election. Many Americans previously gave little thought about allegations Obama was
ineligible for the presidency, now those Americans have come to the realization they
were bamboozled by the mainstream news media who skirted around the simple fact
Obama does not have a legitimate birth certificate supporting his claim of U.S.
citizenship. The news media has used deception, deceit, dishonor, and corruption to hide
the truth from America.
Aside from all the technical proof of Obama’s ineligibility is the simple fact that Obama
has not produced a genuine birth certificate and he has spent millions of dollars in legal
fees defending his self perceived right to hide public disclosure that he does not have one.
Amazingly the conspiracy to defraud our constitution has extended well beyond the brain
dead cabbage patch voter by reaching into the highest levels of our government.
One can offer excuses for the youth of ignorance and the stupor of the aged for their
brain dead cabbage patch votes, but it’s evil politics of constitutional destruction for those
who know better. It is unconscionable that our congress has not held hearings on
Obama’s eligibility.
The Democratic Party has succeeded in creating big government, they are well on their
way to completing their task of creating a welfare state by bankrupting the country, and
now, right before our very eyes, their final assault on our constitution is aided by
apathetic Americans, scared politicians, and a corrupt news media.................more...
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 7:02:41 PM by TLittlefella
There can be no doubt that Trump is the 21st century George Patton in civilian clothes.
General Trump has stepped forward to lead the charge against an apparent nationwide
conspiracy by the brain dead cabbage patch to dishonor and defraud our constitution by
accepting and endorsing a fraudulent president of our United States.
General Trump has amassed huge support from those Americans who long ago General Trump has stepped forward to lead the charge against an apparent nationwide
conspiracy by the brain dead cabbage patch to dishonor and defraud our constitution by
accepting and endorsing a fraudulent president of our United States.
recognized the indefensible fraud perpetrated against America in the 2008 presidential
election. Many Americans previously gave little thought about allegations Obama was
ineligible for the presidency, now those Americans have come to the realization they
were bamboozled by the mainstream news media who skirted around the simple fact
Obama does not have a legitimate birth certificate supporting his claim of U.S.
citizenship. The news media has used deception, deceit, dishonor, and corruption to hide
the truth from America.
Aside from all the technical proof of Obama’s ineligibility is the simple fact that Obama
has not produced a genuine birth certificate and he has spent millions of dollars in legal
fees defending his self perceived right to hide public disclosure that he does not have one.
Amazingly the conspiracy to defraud our constitution has extended well beyond the brain
dead cabbage patch voter by reaching into the highest levels of our government.
One can offer excuses for the youth of ignorance and the stupor of the aged for their
brain dead cabbage patch votes, but it’s evil politics of constitutional destruction for those
who know better. It is unconscionable that our congress has not held hearings on
Obama’s eligibility.
The Democratic Party has succeeded in creating big government, they are well on their
way to completing their task of creating a welfare state by bankrupting the country, and
now, right before our very eyes, their final assault on our constitution is aided by
apathetic Americans, scared politicians, and a corrupt news media.................more...
"...frustrating setback to the Cultural Marxists, a new poll finds that nearly half of those registered to vote in the Mississippi Republican primaries still feel as though interracial marriage should be ..."
Fifty years and billions of dollars have been invested to produce movies, television shows, books, magazines, and newspapers that promote White genocide on a daily basis. I'm not even going to count the brainwashing that goes on at schools.
In what must be a terribly frustrating setback to the Cultural Marxists, a new poll finds that nearly half of those registered to vote in the Mississippi Republican primaries still feel as though interracial marriage should be outlawed!
Be sure to leave your comments after reading the story below:
And make plans to join us on the radio program tonight (Saturday, April 9; 6pm - 9pm CST) as we discuss this, and many more, groundbreaking stories! Our annual series honoring Confederate History Month will resume as well.
Details here:
The Political Cesspool is the official radio program of Confederate History Month 2011.
The Political Cesspool
P.O. Box 34336
Bartlett, TN 38134, USA
Coast to Coast They Hate the Most
Coast to Coast They Hate the Most
By Daniel Greenfield Full Story
Wisconsin’s labor vote effort may have failed to displace Prosser, but that’s only one plank of the Democratic program to mobilize their base. So far the theme is labor, women and blacks.
Wisconsin kicked the labor unions into high gear, which is important as it locks down part of a potential swing vote. Now comes rhetoric about Republicans waging a war on women.
There is “a war on women,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi says. No there isn’t, but there is a war for the female vote. Hitting Republicans on social services cuts. Putting abortion front and center. New DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz calls Republican attempts to defund abortion ‘a violent act against women’.
According to Congresswoman Slaughter, Republicans were elected to kill women. The rhetoric is not that much more subtle than Schumer repeating ‘Extreme Republicans’ over and over again. But it’s narrowly targeted.
By Daniel Greenfield Full Story
Wisconsin’s labor vote effort may have failed to displace Prosser, but that’s only one plank of the Democratic program to mobilize their base. So far the theme is labor, women and blacks.Wisconsin kicked the labor unions into high gear, which is important as it locks down part of a potential swing vote. Now comes rhetoric about Republicans waging a war on women.
There is “a war on women,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi says. No there isn’t, but there is a war for the female vote. Hitting Republicans on social services cuts. Putting abortion front and center. New DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz calls Republican attempts to defund abortion ‘a violent act against women’.
According to Congresswoman Slaughter, Republicans were elected to kill women. The rhetoric is not that much more subtle than Schumer repeating ‘Extreme Republicans’ over and over again. But it’s narrowly targeted.
Who is Herman Cain and Why Should Americans Care
Who is Herman Cain and Why Should Americans Care
American Thinker ^ | 4/8/11 | Daryl Mahan
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 12:32:38 PM by justsaynomore
In the coming weeks and months the American public will hear more and more mention of the name Herman Cain as he embarks on a most important journey. The country he was born and raised in is in turmoil, facing crises of potentially insurmountable proportions on several levels. Our overall economy is in shambles with the nation's debt level higher than any other nation in recorded history.
Born in Tennessee in 1945, many of Herman Cain's most formative years were during a time when American society viewed and treated its members quite differently based on their outward appearance. At the age of six, Herman Cain and his younger brother secretly challenged this societal segregation by quite literally testing the waters. Watching out for the other as he took his turn, they each sampled the water from two public drinking fountains, each specified only for use by one of the two dominant races of American citizens at the time. Herman Cain and his brother learned in that moment that the separation of the races was baseless. The water from each fountain was exactly the same; each no different from the other. The burning question was planted in their young minds: ''What's the big deal?''
By the close of the first decade of this current millennium, American society, seemingly evolved beyond the ignorance that fomented such outward discrimination, elected Barack Obama, born of a Caucasian American mother and a Black African father, to the office of President on the United States. Obama's ascendancy to that most coveted and most powerful position in the land, upon reflection and rational analysis, was the result of American society's collective guilt and remorse for the decades of disrespect, disgraceful and tortuous treatment of those members reflecting Obama's father's physical attributes. His ascendancy could not have been based on professional qualifications and grand achievements of his life's work, for while a rational, honest examination of Obama's past reveals abundant charisma, charm, and eloquence of speech, there is certainly no history of accomplishment that would warrant such empowerment.
This is not an examination of Obama or American societal shortcomings. The aforestated reflection is necessary only to caution that in the upcoming Presidential election of 2012, it is certain that the powers that capitalized on the societal guilt and remorse of the American collective in 2008 will absolutely foment that emotion again should there be a strong challenger to the ideology and re-election of Barack Obama. As distasteful as it may be, it is a reality that any such challenger, regardless of their personal achievements and political acumen, will have to battle to a certain degree those who view America's exceptionalism and individual freedom and liberties as a threat to the vision of global governance and to the nations of the world dominated by socialist, totalitarian ideologies and dictatorial regimes; the puppet-masters of America's left-wing progressivism and "Race-Bait, Incorporated" segregationists.
But what if an individual who can neutralize that ignorance, and who does have professional qualifications and considerable life achievements to warrant the responsibilities of the office of President of the United States, steps forward? Someone who is willing to undergo the scrutiny and make the commitments necessary to earn that ascendancy and redirect this great nation back toward a course of prosperity. Shouldn't that individual be seriously considered? That individual is Herman Cain..................
American Thinker ^ | 4/8/11 | Daryl Mahan
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 12:32:38 PM by justsaynomore
In the coming weeks and months the American public will hear more and more mention of the name Herman Cain as he embarks on a most important journey. The country he was born and raised in is in turmoil, facing crises of potentially insurmountable proportions on several levels. Our overall economy is in shambles with the nation's debt level higher than any other nation in recorded history.
Born in Tennessee in 1945, many of Herman Cain's most formative years were during a time when American society viewed and treated its members quite differently based on their outward appearance. At the age of six, Herman Cain and his younger brother secretly challenged this societal segregation by quite literally testing the waters. Watching out for the other as he took his turn, they each sampled the water from two public drinking fountains, each specified only for use by one of the two dominant races of American citizens at the time. Herman Cain and his brother learned in that moment that the separation of the races was baseless. The water from each fountain was exactly the same; each no different from the other. The burning question was planted in their young minds: ''What's the big deal?''
By the close of the first decade of this current millennium, American society, seemingly evolved beyond the ignorance that fomented such outward discrimination, elected Barack Obama, born of a Caucasian American mother and a Black African father, to the office of President on the United States. Obama's ascendancy to that most coveted and most powerful position in the land, upon reflection and rational analysis, was the result of American society's collective guilt and remorse for the decades of disrespect, disgraceful and tortuous treatment of those members reflecting Obama's father's physical attributes. His ascendancy could not have been based on professional qualifications and grand achievements of his life's work, for while a rational, honest examination of Obama's past reveals abundant charisma, charm, and eloquence of speech, there is certainly no history of accomplishment that would warrant such empowerment.
This is not an examination of Obama or American societal shortcomings. The aforestated reflection is necessary only to caution that in the upcoming Presidential election of 2012, it is certain that the powers that capitalized on the societal guilt and remorse of the American collective in 2008 will absolutely foment that emotion again should there be a strong challenger to the ideology and re-election of Barack Obama. As distasteful as it may be, it is a reality that any such challenger, regardless of their personal achievements and political acumen, will have to battle to a certain degree those who view America's exceptionalism and individual freedom and liberties as a threat to the vision of global governance and to the nations of the world dominated by socialist, totalitarian ideologies and dictatorial regimes; the puppet-masters of America's left-wing progressivism and "Race-Bait, Incorporated" segregationists.
But what if an individual who can neutralize that ignorance, and who does have professional qualifications and considerable life achievements to warrant the responsibilities of the office of President of the United States, steps forward? Someone who is willing to undergo the scrutiny and make the commitments necessary to earn that ascendancy and redirect this great nation back toward a course of prosperity. Shouldn't that individual be seriously considered? That individual is Herman Cain..................
Why is the Muslim World So Resistant to the Gospel?
Why is the Muslim World So Resistant to the Gospel?
AlbertMohler.com ^ | April 8, 2011 | Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr.,
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 1:24:59 PM by wmfights
The future shape of the world appears to be a worldview competition between Christianity, Islam, and Western Secularism. For Christians, both of these worldviews represent real and lasting challenges to evangelism. Neither of these is a particularly new challenge, and the Christian encounter with Islam is now over a millennium in duration.
Writing over thirty years ago, when most American evangelicals had little knowledge of Islam, missiologist J. Herbert Kane of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School outlined six reasons why the evangelization of the Muslim world has been so difficult. His explanation of “Why the Muslim Soil is So Barren” remains both instructive and important.
1. Islam is Younger than Christianity
Having borrowed from both Judaism and Christianity, Islam “has just enough Christianity in it to inoculate it against the real thing.” As with Mormonism, Muslims claim a later revelation that corrects and supersedes the Bible. This represents a very real challenge to the Christian, who will base the argument for the Gospel on the biblical revelation.
2. Islam Denies the Deity and the Death of Christ
Islam not only denies the deity of Christ, it finds the idea abhorrent. “If a missionary but mentions the deity of Christ the fanatical Muslim is likely to spit on his shadow to show his utter contempt for such a blasphemous suggestion.” Furthermore, the Qur’an denies that Christ actually died on the cross, thus taking away the very act of our atonement. “There appears to be no way around these two obstacles,” Kane lamented. “The Christian missionary can find many points of similarity between Christianity and Islam, and certainly he will want to make full use of these; but sooner or later he must come to the central theme of the gospel — the cross. At that point he runs into a stone wall. He can remove many offending things, but he can never do away with the offense of the cross. That and the deity of Christ are hurdles that can never be removed.”
3. Islam’s Treatment of Defectors
“All religions, including the broadest of them — Hinduism — look with disfavor on the devotee who changes his religion,” Kane advised. “But it remained for Islam to devise the Law of Apostasy, which permits the community to kill the adherent who defects from the faith.”
For Islam, “conversion is a one-way street.” Even when death is not a real threat, losing the bonds of community and family are huge costs.
4. The Solidarity of Muslim Society
Even where Muslims are not in a majority, such as in Western nations, they often concentrate in specific areas or communities where this solidarity can be approximated.
Under such an arrangement, efforts by Christians to evangelize meet a unified resistance, and a decision to leave Islam can be construed as an unpatriotic act, tantamount to rejecting one’s nation and people.
5. The Public Practice of Religion
Often overlooked by many Christians is the fact that a faithful Muslim demonstrates that faithfulness in a public pattern of prayers and observances. A convert who ceases these observances becomes immediately evident. This system of public prayer and ritual represents a powerful support for Islam and a powerful deterrent to conversion to any other belief system.
6. The Memory of the Crusades
As Kane explains, “To Christians in the West the Crusades were a bad dream, of which we have only the faintest recollection; but to the Arabs they are the greatest proof of the Christian hatred for Islam.” Christians bear the burden of a long and intensely bitter Muslim memory. Though atrocities were common on both sides, the atrocities committed by Christians were uniquely a repudiation of central Christian teachings.
In the mind of many Muslims, the Crusades feel like a living memory. To many within the Islamic world, Christians remain Crusaders, and evangelism is just another way of continuing the crusading mission.
Professor Kane’s breakdown of these obstacles is not only interesting and helpful, it also serves as a reminder that these issues are hardly new. At the same time, Christians must evangelize, no matter the obstacles to Christian witness.
Christians must remember that the Holy Spirit can break down the greatest wall of resistance and the Word of God is, as He says, like a hammer that shatters a rock. Dr. Kane’s arguments help us to understand the challenge, but were not meant to suppress evangelism. To the contrary, he wanted the church to be better informed as we fulfill the command of Christ.
AlbertMohler.com ^ | April 8, 2011 | Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr.,
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 1:24:59 PM by wmfights
The future shape of the world appears to be a worldview competition between Christianity, Islam, and Western Secularism. For Christians, both of these worldviews represent real and lasting challenges to evangelism. Neither of these is a particularly new challenge, and the Christian encounter with Islam is now over a millennium in duration.
Writing over thirty years ago, when most American evangelicals had little knowledge of Islam, missiologist J. Herbert Kane of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School outlined six reasons why the evangelization of the Muslim world has been so difficult. His explanation of “Why the Muslim Soil is So Barren” remains both instructive and important.
1. Islam is Younger than Christianity
Having borrowed from both Judaism and Christianity, Islam “has just enough Christianity in it to inoculate it against the real thing.” As with Mormonism, Muslims claim a later revelation that corrects and supersedes the Bible. This represents a very real challenge to the Christian, who will base the argument for the Gospel on the biblical revelation.
2. Islam Denies the Deity and the Death of Christ
Islam not only denies the deity of Christ, it finds the idea abhorrent. “If a missionary but mentions the deity of Christ the fanatical Muslim is likely to spit on his shadow to show his utter contempt for such a blasphemous suggestion.” Furthermore, the Qur’an denies that Christ actually died on the cross, thus taking away the very act of our atonement. “There appears to be no way around these two obstacles,” Kane lamented. “The Christian missionary can find many points of similarity between Christianity and Islam, and certainly he will want to make full use of these; but sooner or later he must come to the central theme of the gospel — the cross. At that point he runs into a stone wall. He can remove many offending things, but he can never do away with the offense of the cross. That and the deity of Christ are hurdles that can never be removed.”
3. Islam’s Treatment of Defectors
“All religions, including the broadest of them — Hinduism — look with disfavor on the devotee who changes his religion,” Kane advised. “But it remained for Islam to devise the Law of Apostasy, which permits the community to kill the adherent who defects from the faith.”
For Islam, “conversion is a one-way street.” Even when death is not a real threat, losing the bonds of community and family are huge costs.
4. The Solidarity of Muslim Society
Even where Muslims are not in a majority, such as in Western nations, they often concentrate in specific areas or communities where this solidarity can be approximated.
Under such an arrangement, efforts by Christians to evangelize meet a unified resistance, and a decision to leave Islam can be construed as an unpatriotic act, tantamount to rejecting one’s nation and people.
5. The Public Practice of Religion
Often overlooked by many Christians is the fact that a faithful Muslim demonstrates that faithfulness in a public pattern of prayers and observances. A convert who ceases these observances becomes immediately evident. This system of public prayer and ritual represents a powerful support for Islam and a powerful deterrent to conversion to any other belief system.
6. The Memory of the Crusades
As Kane explains, “To Christians in the West the Crusades were a bad dream, of which we have only the faintest recollection; but to the Arabs they are the greatest proof of the Christian hatred for Islam.” Christians bear the burden of a long and intensely bitter Muslim memory. Though atrocities were common on both sides, the atrocities committed by Christians were uniquely a repudiation of central Christian teachings.
In the mind of many Muslims, the Crusades feel like a living memory. To many within the Islamic world, Christians remain Crusaders, and evangelism is just another way of continuing the crusading mission.
Professor Kane’s breakdown of these obstacles is not only interesting and helpful, it also serves as a reminder that these issues are hardly new. At the same time, Christians must evangelize, no matter the obstacles to Christian witness.
Christians must remember that the Holy Spirit can break down the greatest wall of resistance and the Word of God is, as He says, like a hammer that shatters a rock. Dr. Kane’s arguments help us to understand the challenge, but were not meant to suppress evangelism. To the contrary, he wanted the church to be better informed as we fulfill the command of Christ.
ACORN, Obama Behind Plan To Dump Garbage On Speaker Boehner’s Home?
ACORN, Obama Behind Plan To Dump Garbage On Speaker Boehner’s Home?
David Horowitz's NewsReal Blog ^ | Matthew Vadum
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 1:36:10 PM by Michael van der Galien
The Democratic Party is officially encouraging supporters to go to Speaker John Boehner’s house and dump garbage on his lawn in order to intimidate him into rubber-stamping President Obama’s destructive spending spree. Such protests can easily turn violent, especially with the tense, hyper-partisan atmosphere on Capitol Hill right now.
Is it a coincidence that not long after longtime ACORN operative Patrick Gaspard took over as executive director of the Democratic National Committee the DNC is planning destructive ACORN-like protests? Not bloody likely. As chief of the DNC’s day-to-day operations, Gaspard runs Organizing for America, the Saul Alinsky-inspired organization created to wage war on American democracy. Gaspard’s fingerprints are all over this. It’s what the former Obama White House political director does for a living.
But how do we actually know this is a DNC-approved event? Because the event advertised on Facebook is organized by longtime DNC employee Jonah Goodman.
Goodman is listed as a member of the DNC network on his Facebook page. According to Facebook rules (under the heading “How do I join a supported Facebook network?”) this means he is an employee of the DNC. Facebook instructs users as follows: “To join a work network, you need to have a work email address from a supported company. This will put you on a network with your coworkers.”
David Horowitz's NewsReal Blog ^ | Matthew Vadum
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 1:36:10 PM by Michael van der Galien
The Democratic Party is officially encouraging supporters to go to Speaker John Boehner’s house and dump garbage on his lawn in order to intimidate him into rubber-stamping President Obama’s destructive spending spree. Such protests can easily turn violent, especially with the tense, hyper-partisan atmosphere on Capitol Hill right now.
Is it a coincidence that not long after longtime ACORN operative Patrick Gaspard took over as executive director of the Democratic National Committee the DNC is planning destructive ACORN-like protests? Not bloody likely. As chief of the DNC’s day-to-day operations, Gaspard runs Organizing for America, the Saul Alinsky-inspired organization created to wage war on American democracy. Gaspard’s fingerprints are all over this. It’s what the former Obama White House political director does for a living.
But how do we actually know this is a DNC-approved event? Because the event advertised on Facebook is organized by longtime DNC employee Jonah Goodman.
Goodman is listed as a member of the DNC network on his Facebook page. According to Facebook rules (under the heading “How do I join a supported Facebook network?”) this means he is an employee of the DNC. Facebook instructs users as follows: “To join a work network, you need to have a work email address from a supported company. This will put you on a network with your coworkers.”
(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...
Rep. Allen West will vote no on budget deal
Rep. Allen West will vote no on budget deal
The Hill ^ | 04/09/11 | Bob Cusack
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 2:21:21 PM by Qbert
Rep. Allen West is against the bipartisan budget deal between Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and the Obama administration.
West (R-Fla.) told The Hill that $39 billion in cuts is insufficient. Asked whether he was pleased with the agreement on policy riders, West responded, "It's all about the money."
West, a freshman who is popular with the Tea Party, said he is a firm "no" on the measure, which will be voted on next week.
The Hill ^ | 04/09/11 | Bob Cusack
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 2:21:21 PM by Qbert
Rep. Allen West is against the bipartisan budget deal between Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and the Obama administration.
West (R-Fla.) told The Hill that $39 billion in cuts is insufficient. Asked whether he was pleased with the agreement on policy riders, West responded, "It's all about the money."
West, a freshman who is popular with the Tea Party, said he is a firm "no" on the measure, which will be voted on next week.
Was Glenn Beck Ousted From Fox by the Saudis?
Was Glenn Beck Ousted From Fox by the Saudis?
diana west.net ^ | April 6, 2011 | Diana West
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 2:26:29 PM by NOCO229
As a longtime News Corp.-watcher, Prince-Talal-watcher, Talal-News-Corp-watcher, I'm not saying, I'm just saying:
Wednesday, March 30, 2011: James Murdoch, youngest son of Rupert Murdoch, "cemented his position as his father's eventual heir to run the entertainment conglomerate when he was elevated this week to the No. 3 position in the company's executive ranks." To help things set better, he's moving from London to New York.
April 4, 2011: Bill O'Reilly says Pastor Terry Jones "has blood on his hands" after Jones burns a copy of the Koran in Florida and Muslims in Afghanistan murder people.
April 4, 2011: To discuss the mayhem and murder that was the Afghan Muslim response to the burning of a copy of the Koran in Florida, Sean Hannity scheduled Zuhdi Jasser, whose "private" sharia is so irrelevant to classical Islam that his commentary is endlessly confusing at best, and Ahmed Bedier, longtime spokesmodel for a constellation of organization related and linked to such jihad groups as Hamas and Hezbollah,
April 6, 2011: Fox News and Glenn Beck agree to "divorce."
What connects these disparate incidents? Beside a short time-frame, I don't know. I do know James Murdoch is known for his trash talk about Israel (sez the Palestinians "were kicked out of their f— homes and had nowhere to f— live"), his green enthusiasms (News Corp. is the first entertainment conglom to be "carbon neutral") and for being a former hip hop impressario (wow; not my dream date). The 38-year-old is also very, very close to 56-year-old Prince Talal, and was Talal's choice to succeed Murdoch (chalk one up for Talal).
Not one to let politics to get in the way of profits, I am sure, it is also the case that as a Talal-pal (not to mention everything else), James is likely to keep certain things out of the way of Fox politics. I would imagine that Hannity's recent maiden voyages into "sharia" talk (bet that's all over with) and Beck's ongoing explorations of sharia and Islam don't fit his bill. That stuff's been buttoned up for ten years now on Fox; no reason to spoil a good brand now with free inquiry into the ideology that drives our mortal enemies....
diana west.net ^ | April 6, 2011 | Diana West
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 2:26:29 PM by NOCO229
As a longtime News Corp.-watcher, Prince-Talal-watcher, Talal-News-Corp-watcher, I'm not saying, I'm just saying:
Wednesday, March 30, 2011: James Murdoch, youngest son of Rupert Murdoch, "cemented his position as his father's eventual heir to run the entertainment conglomerate when he was elevated this week to the No. 3 position in the company's executive ranks." To help things set better, he's moving from London to New York.
April 4, 2011: Bill O'Reilly says Pastor Terry Jones "has blood on his hands" after Jones burns a copy of the Koran in Florida and Muslims in Afghanistan murder people.
April 4, 2011: To discuss the mayhem and murder that was the Afghan Muslim response to the burning of a copy of the Koran in Florida, Sean Hannity scheduled Zuhdi Jasser, whose "private" sharia is so irrelevant to classical Islam that his commentary is endlessly confusing at best, and Ahmed Bedier, longtime spokesmodel for a constellation of organization related and linked to such jihad groups as Hamas and Hezbollah,
April 6, 2011: Fox News and Glenn Beck agree to "divorce."
What connects these disparate incidents? Beside a short time-frame, I don't know. I do know James Murdoch is known for his trash talk about Israel (sez the Palestinians "were kicked out of their f— homes and had nowhere to f— live"), his green enthusiasms (News Corp. is the first entertainment conglom to be "carbon neutral") and for being a former hip hop impressario (wow; not my dream date). The 38-year-old is also very, very close to 56-year-old Prince Talal, and was Talal's choice to succeed Murdoch (chalk one up for Talal).
Not one to let politics to get in the way of profits, I am sure, it is also the case that as a Talal-pal (not to mention everything else), James is likely to keep certain things out of the way of Fox politics. I would imagine that Hannity's recent maiden voyages into "sharia" talk (bet that's all over with) and Beck's ongoing explorations of sharia and Islam don't fit his bill. That stuff's been buttoned up for ten years now on Fox; no reason to spoil a good brand now with free inquiry into the ideology that drives our mortal enemies....
IT’S NO DEAL, IT’S A SELLOUT ~ Dick Morris
IT’S NO DEAL, IT’S A SELLOUT
Dick Morris .com ^ | April 9,2011 | Dick Morris
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 3:25:41 PM by Hojczyk
John Boehner has just given away the Republican victory of 2010 at the bargaining table. Like the proverbial Uncle Sam who always wins the war but loses the peace, he has unilaterally disarmed the Republican Party by showing that he will not shut down the government and will, instead, willingly give way on even the most modest of cuts in order to avoid it. He now has no arrows left in his quiver.
Having failed to stand firm for just $61 billion in cuts in a budget of $3.7 trillion, how can we expect him to stand firm over the debt limit extension or the 2012 budget? We can’t. The excellent budget proposals of Paul Ryan are no more than a pipe dream now. Boehner has He sold us out now and he’ll sell us out again.
It is the duty of every Republican Congressman to vote no on this terrible deal. It violates our campaign promises to the American people. We promised $100 billion of cuts and we delivered $38 billion ($62 billion on a twelve month basis). In the Republican House’s first real test out of the box it has broken the promise over which it was elected. Only in Meat Loaf’s music is “two out of three not bad.”
This concession makes it clear that:
* Obamacare will not be defunded. * The EPA will not be blocked from regulating carbon. * The NLRB will not be stopped from forcing an end to secret ballots in union contests. * Medicaid will not be block granted and turned over to the states. * Welfare spending will not be cut nor work requirements imposed. * The FCC will not be stopped from regulating talk radio.
Dick Morris .com ^ | April 9,2011 | Dick Morris
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 3:25:41 PM by Hojczyk
John Boehner has just given away the Republican victory of 2010 at the bargaining table. Like the proverbial Uncle Sam who always wins the war but loses the peace, he has unilaterally disarmed the Republican Party by showing that he will not shut down the government and will, instead, willingly give way on even the most modest of cuts in order to avoid it. He now has no arrows left in his quiver.
Having failed to stand firm for just $61 billion in cuts in a budget of $3.7 trillion, how can we expect him to stand firm over the debt limit extension or the 2012 budget? We can’t. The excellent budget proposals of Paul Ryan are no more than a pipe dream now. Boehner has He sold us out now and he’ll sell us out again.
It is the duty of every Republican Congressman to vote no on this terrible deal. It violates our campaign promises to the American people. We promised $100 billion of cuts and we delivered $38 billion ($62 billion on a twelve month basis). In the Republican House’s first real test out of the box it has broken the promise over which it was elected. Only in Meat Loaf’s music is “two out of three not bad.”
This concession makes it clear that:
* Obamacare will not be defunded. * The EPA will not be blocked from regulating carbon. * The NLRB will not be stopped from forcing an end to secret ballots in union contests. * Medicaid will not be block granted and turned over to the states. * Welfare spending will not be cut nor work requirements imposed. * The FCC will not be stopped from regulating talk radio.
In short, we have accomplished nothing by our hard work in 2010.
Except we have learned a lesson.
And the lesson is this: We need to purify our party and purge it of the likes of John Boehner and all those Congressmen who vote for the budget sellout. The Tea Party must take the lead in this purifying fire. We must not let the RINOs win!
DickMorris.com will post prominently (and permanently) the names of all GOP freshmen who vote for this rotten deal. It will be in a column headed: THESE ARE THE SELLOUTS. Check it out and back their primary opponents!
Does Lucas Smith has a [Bridge] Birth Certificate he wants to sell to the Donald ?
Does Lucas Smith has a [Bridge] Birth Certificate he wants to sell to the Donald ?
The Birthers ^ | April 09, 2011 | The Birthers
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 4:40:20 PM by RobinMasters
Recently I have been receiving a lot of e-mail pointing to the birth certificate Lucas Smith had supposedly retrieved under great personal danger from Kenya as the definitive proof Obama was not born in the United States. Tracing them back they seem to come from one email server, although under different accounts.
Of course I seen the Smith document and read his affidavits submitted to the various courts by Orley Taitz.
Am I impressed? No. Am I as skeptical about this birth certificate as I am about Obama's Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth? YES!
Why would I be willing to dismiss this as a forgery? The answer is in the questions not answered about this so called Kenyan smoking gun.
Was the Lucas Smith Birth Certificate (LSBC) ever tested? Not to my knowledge and trust me if it was people would have sent me the proof.
Did Lucas Smith ever prove he was in Kenya? No, he alludes to having receipts documenting his stay in Kenya, but nothing has been released to the public,
1. No, US Passport showing entry or exit visas for Kenya.
2. No, airline tickets showing his name to Kenya
3. No, hotel receipts showing his name or date
4. No, restaurant receipts,
5. No, credit card receipts that could cross reference any other receipt he could offer.
The Birthers ^ | April 09, 2011 | The Birthers
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 4:40:20 PM by RobinMasters
Recently I have been receiving a lot of e-mail pointing to the birth certificate Lucas Smith had supposedly retrieved under great personal danger from Kenya as the definitive proof Obama was not born in the United States. Tracing them back they seem to come from one email server, although under different accounts.
Of course I seen the Smith document and read his affidavits submitted to the various courts by Orley Taitz.
Am I impressed? No. Am I as skeptical about this birth certificate as I am about Obama's Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth? YES!
Why would I be willing to dismiss this as a forgery? The answer is in the questions not answered about this so called Kenyan smoking gun.
Was the Lucas Smith Birth Certificate (LSBC) ever tested? Not to my knowledge and trust me if it was people would have sent me the proof.
Did Lucas Smith ever prove he was in Kenya? No, he alludes to having receipts documenting his stay in Kenya, but nothing has been released to the public,
1. No, US Passport showing entry or exit visas for Kenya.
2. No, airline tickets showing his name to Kenya
3. No, hotel receipts showing his name or date
4. No, restaurant receipts,
5. No, credit card receipts that could cross reference any other receipt he could offer.
(Excerpt) Read more at birthers.org ...
The Donald, O'Reilly and Obama A Basically Honest People
The Donald, O'Reilly and Obama
A Basically Honest People
Share18 |  | (10) Comments | Subscribe | Print friendly | Contact Us |
I have long had a sneaking admiration for an English nobleman – not something to which most of those of us of Irish ancestry would ordinarily tend to admit.One of my heroes is Lord Melbourne, who at the age of eight, to the dismay of his parents, had not uttered a single word.
That ended one night at a dinner party when the lady seated next to him at table asked “Little boy, why do you not speak?”
Some years later he observed “The Irish are a basically honest people; they seldom speak well of one another.”
He was right on target.
In that tradition allow me to speak critically of a onetime fellow Long Islander, the loquacious Bill O’Reilly, a Nassau County native but, as he once told me, a onetime resident of neighboring Suffolk County, L.I., that his Dad was among my fellow Brooklyn Prep alumnus, although he was a few years ahead of me at the Prep.
He went into the Navy in WWII and I soon joined the better part of the U.S. Naval Service, the Marine Corps. (I had to get that in. It’s obligatory Semper Fi).
I must admit that on the single occasion Bill and I spoke – when I was doing a profile of him for Newsmax - Bill was both gracious and friendly. That having been said, allow me to have at him. Albeit gently and admiringly.
In simple terms, Bill O’ tends on occasion to be what we used to call a smart Aleck. I attribute that failing to the unfortunate fact that he graduated from Harvard University, not a fit place for any proud Mick.
He could, instead, have attended one of the many fine N.Y.C. Catholic colleges such as Manhattan College where most of my father’s family, including my grandsire matriculated and my late Uncle Joe, a Basketball Hall of Famer, once coached.
Bill’s smart-alecky attitude was on display when he took on “the Donald,” as his ex-wife calls Mr. Trump. He appears to have been offended by the Donald’s expression of doubt about Barack Obama’s true birthplace, noting as Mr. Trump has, the President’s adamant refusal to reveal his birth certificate.......................
Another Big Lincoln Lie Exposed by Thomas J. DiLorenzo (Deport Black People?)
Another Big Lincoln Lie Exposed
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
Recently by Thomas DiLorenzo: Paul Krugman’s 'Civil War' Fantasies
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
Recently by Thomas DiLorenzo: Paul Krugman’s 'Civil War' Fantasies
~ Abraham Lincoln, Debate with Stephen Douglas, Sept. 18, 1858, in Abraham Lincoln: Speeches and Writings, 1832-1858 (New York: Library of America, 1989), pp. 636-637.
These are the words of the real Lincoln, who was as much a white supremacist as any man of his time. In fact, he was a much more extreme white supremacist than most, for he advocated "colonization" or the deportation of black people from America for his entire adult life. As soon as he entered politics in the early 1830s he became a "manager" of the Illinois Colonization Society which sought to use state tax funds to deport the small number of free blacks living in Illinois out of the state (the state amended its constitution in 1848 to prohibit the immigration of black people into the state, an amendment that Lincoln supported).
These historical facts have long presented a problem for the purveyors of the comic book/fairy tale history of Lincoln that has been taught to Americans for generations. For they suggest that, rather than being a racial saint, as the comic book/fairy tale version of history contends, the exact opposite is true. The Lincoln cult has mostly covered up these truths by seeing to it that they rarely, if ever, make it into the public school textbooks. But just in case the truth does seep out, the Cult has concocted several excuses, "justifications," and rationales for Lincoln’s extreme racist language and actions.
One excuse that is associated with Princeton University historian James McPherson is that "Honest Abe" was lying when he spoke of colonization in connection with emancipation (as he always did) so as to soften Northern opposition to emancipation. This is called the "lullaby theory" among Lincoln cultists. Lincoln himself never said any such thing; McPherson simply fabricated the story out of thin air.
A second excuse is an equally unfounded theory that is not based on anything Lincoln himself ever said. It is a speculation that, sometime in 1863, Lincoln experienced some kind of divine transformation and was no longer the extreme racist and white supremacist that his speeches had established him as being for his entire adult life. Lincoln cultists naively contend that because Lincoln quit making speeches about colonization, he must have abandoned the idea.
Of course, politicians always do their best to keep the public in the dark with regard to their political machinations; they do not make public speeches announcing every bit of their strategies and conniving. It is not unusual for a politician to keep his plans to himself, and this is true of Lincoln as much as any politician. The divine transformation theory is based on an extraordinarily naïve view of the political world.
Magness and Page meticulously document how, during the last two years of Lincoln’s presidency, work on various colonization plans "progressed . . . often aided by the president’s direct encouragement and approval" (p. 10). Lengthy discussions took place with the British and Dutch governments, which were negotiating on behalf of business interests in their own countries that were experiencing labor shortages in such places as British Honduras, Guiana, and elsewhere.............
http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo205.html
Why Americans Should "Cair" About the Growing Enemy Within
Why Americans Should "Cair" About the Growing Enemy Within
As I continue to sacrifice my Fourth Amendment rights while I take off my shoes and subject myself to being x-rayed and illegally molested by TSA officials at the airport, I am constantly reminded of the threat that violent jihadists pose to Americans everywhere. However, not all jihadists are tasked with the commission of perpetrating mass murder upon the citizens of Israel and America. Many jihadists have altered their.....
http://www.newswithviews.com/
by Dave Hodges
As I continue to sacrifice my Fourth Amendment rights while I take off my shoes and subject myself to being x-rayed and illegally molested by TSA officials at the airport, I am constantly reminded of the threat that violent jihadists pose to Americans everywhere. However, not all jihadists are tasked with the commission of perpetrating mass murder upon the citizens of Israel and America. Many jihadists have altered their.....
http://www.newswithviews.com/
by Dave Hodges
EDITORIAL: America’s coming ground war in Libya--Obama’s lack of leadership pushes oil prices up
EDITORIAL: America’s coming ground war in Libya--Obama’s lack of leadership pushes oil prices up
The Washington Times ^ | April 8, 2011 | Editorial
Posted on Friday, April 08, 2011 8:36:37 PM by jazusamo
When the intervention in Libya began, President Obama insisted no American ground forces would be involved. On Thursday, the U.S. Africa Command combatant commander speculated that troops may be needed, even if he considered it a bad idea.
In testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Army Gen. Carter Ham discussed the increasingly complex situation in Libya, explaining that the war had reached a point of stalemate. Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi’s offensive had largely been halted, but rebel forces have no chance of toppling him from power. Asked if U.S. ground forces might be needed to tip the balance, he said, “I suspect there might be some consideration of that.”
The general added his personal view that it probably would not be “the ideal circumstance, again for the regional reaction that having American boots on the ground would entail.”
The main problem with the Libyan war has been a lack of conceptual unity. Coalition military performance has been exemplary, as one might expect. Imposing a no-fly zone over Libya and conducting air strikes on Col. Gadhafi’s offensive ground forces come as close to a routine military operation as any such complex and violent effort can be. Mr. Obama could well have claimed “mission accomplished” when the White House blandly announced the advent of Operation Unified Protector, which continued the effort originally known as Operation Odyssey Dawn but under NATO leadership. The administration’s real “mission accomplished” was making sure Mr. Obama abandoned his global leadership role as quickly as possible.
America’s rush to the door is the root of the current problem. Mr. Obama’s original concept for intervention was little more than a bumper-sticker slogan, “protect Libyan civilians.”
The Washington Times ^ | April 8, 2011 | Editorial
Posted on Friday, April 08, 2011 8:36:37 PM by jazusamo
When the intervention in Libya began, President Obama insisted no American ground forces would be involved. On Thursday, the U.S. Africa Command combatant commander speculated that troops may be needed, even if he considered it a bad idea.
In testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Army Gen. Carter Ham discussed the increasingly complex situation in Libya, explaining that the war had reached a point of stalemate. Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi’s offensive had largely been halted, but rebel forces have no chance of toppling him from power. Asked if U.S. ground forces might be needed to tip the balance, he said, “I suspect there might be some consideration of that.”
The general added his personal view that it probably would not be “the ideal circumstance, again for the regional reaction that having American boots on the ground would entail.”
The main problem with the Libyan war has been a lack of conceptual unity. Coalition military performance has been exemplary, as one might expect. Imposing a no-fly zone over Libya and conducting air strikes on Col. Gadhafi’s offensive ground forces come as close to a routine military operation as any such complex and violent effort can be. Mr. Obama could well have claimed “mission accomplished” when the White House blandly announced the advent of Operation Unified Protector, which continued the effort originally known as Operation Odyssey Dawn but under NATO leadership. The administration’s real “mission accomplished” was making sure Mr. Obama abandoned his global leadership role as quickly as possible.
America’s rush to the door is the root of the current problem. Mr. Obama’s original concept for intervention was little more than a bumper-sticker slogan, “protect Libyan civilians.”
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Donald Trump Responds (Slams NYT Columnist Gail Collins)
Donald Trump Responds (Slams NYT Columnist Gail Collins)
NYTimes ^
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 5:31:20 AM by quesney
Re “Donald Trump Gets Weirder,” by Gail Collins (column, April 2):
Even before Gail Collins was with the New York Times, she has written nasty and derogatory articles about me. Actually, I have great respect for Ms. Collins in that she has survived so long with so little talent. Her storytelling ability and word usage (coming from me, who has written many bestsellers) is not at a high level. More importantly, her facts are wrong!
...I don't need Ms. Collins's advice. There is a large segment of our society who believe Barack Obama, indeed, was not born in the United States. His grandmother from Kenya stated, on tape, that he was born in Kenya and she was there to watch the birth. His family in Honolulu is fighting over which hospital in Hawaii he was born in-they just don't know.
He has not been able to produce a “birth certificate” -merely a totally unsigned “certificate of live birth”-which is of very little significance. Unlike a birth certificate, a certificate of live birth is very easy to obtain. Equally of importance, there are no records in Hawaii that a Barack Hussein Obama was born there-no bills, no doctors names, no nurses names, no registrations, no payments, etc. As far as the two notices placed in newspapers, some feel the grandparents put an ad in order to show that he was a citizen of the U.S. with all of the benefits. Everybody, after all, and especially then, wanted to be a citizen.
[...]
For some reason, the press protects President Obama beyond anything or anyone I have ever seen.
[...]
Open your eyes, Gail, there's at least a good chance that Barack Hussein Obama has made mincemeat out of our great and cherished Constitution!
DONALD J. TRUMP New York, April 7, 2011
NYTimes ^
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2011 5:31:20 AM by quesney
Re “Donald Trump Gets Weirder,” by Gail Collins (column, April 2):
Even before Gail Collins was with the New York Times, she has written nasty and derogatory articles about me. Actually, I have great respect for Ms. Collins in that she has survived so long with so little talent. Her storytelling ability and word usage (coming from me, who has written many bestsellers) is not at a high level. More importantly, her facts are wrong!
...I don't need Ms. Collins's advice. There is a large segment of our society who believe Barack Obama, indeed, was not born in the United States. His grandmother from Kenya stated, on tape, that he was born in Kenya and she was there to watch the birth. His family in Honolulu is fighting over which hospital in Hawaii he was born in-they just don't know.
He has not been able to produce a “birth certificate” -merely a totally unsigned “certificate of live birth”-which is of very little significance. Unlike a birth certificate, a certificate of live birth is very easy to obtain. Equally of importance, there are no records in Hawaii that a Barack Hussein Obama was born there-no bills, no doctors names, no nurses names, no registrations, no payments, etc. As far as the two notices placed in newspapers, some feel the grandparents put an ad in order to show that he was a citizen of the U.S. with all of the benefits. Everybody, after all, and especially then, wanted to be a citizen.
[...]
For some reason, the press protects President Obama beyond anything or anyone I have ever seen.
[...]
Open your eyes, Gail, there's at least a good chance that Barack Hussein Obama has made mincemeat out of our great and cherished Constitution!
DONALD J. TRUMP New York, April 7, 2011
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Last-minute budget deal narrowly avoids the Big Government shutdown America desperately needs to balance its budget
Last-minute budget deal narrowly avoids the Big Government shutdown America desperately needs to balance its budget
The difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is that the Democrats want to spend us into oblivion while the Republicans only want to spend us into purgatory.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)